Bindinglaw

US-CA11 · jury_instructions

11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 8.1

Jones Act – Negligence and Unseaworthiness – General

activein force · 2025-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

Instruction (Comparative Negligence Defense)

[Name of plaintiff] has brought a claim under a federal statute known as the

Jones Act. The Jones Act provides a remedy to a seaman who, while employed as a

crewmember of a vessel in navigation, suffers personal injuries because of the

negligence of the seaman’s employer, or the employer’s officers, agents, or other

employees.

Specifically, [name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] [describe

the specific act(s) or omission(s) asserted as the defendant’s negligence].

To succeed on a claim under the Jones Act, [name of plaintiff] must prove

each of the following facts by a preponderance of the evidence:

First: you must find that at the time of the alleged injury, [name of plaintiff]

was acting in the course of employment as a crewmember of a vessel in navigation.

Second, you must find that [name of defendant] was negligent.

And third, you must find that the negligence was a legal cause of the injury

or damage [name of plaintiff] sustained.

[In the verdict form that I’ll explain in a moment, you’ll be asked to answer

questions about these factual issues.]

[The parties have agreed that, at the time of the alleged injury, [name of

plaintiff] was acting in the course of employment as a crewmember of a vessel in

navigation so you should accept that as a proven fact.]

2

5.13

Provenance

Source
ca11.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
civil-2025-12
Content hash
f71dd5965d735cf890d8a80420fd5ce6f675c1aca9314f84a2eb5270fa1666eb
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.