Bindinglaw

US-CA11 · jury_instructions

11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 5.7

Civil Rights – 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims – Arrestee, Pretrial Detainee, or

activein force · 2025-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

Convicted Prisoner Alleging Failure to Intervene

In this case, [name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant], while

acting under color of law, failed to intervene when [name of officer] used

excessive force against [name of plaintiff] in violation of the United States

Constitution.

An officer who fails or refuses to intervene when a constitutional

violation such as excessive force takes place in his presence may be held

liable for his failure to intervene.

To succeed on this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove each of the

following facts by a preponderance of the evidence:

First: That [name of officer] used excessive force on [name of plaintiff];

Second: That [name of defendant] [saw [name of officer] use excessive

force] [knew [name of officer] was going to use excessive force];

Third: That [name of defendant] had a realistic opportunity to prevent

harm from occurring;

Fourth: That [name of defendant] failed to take reasonable steps to

prevent harm from occurring;

Fifth: That [name of defendant]’s failure to act caused [name of

2

plaintiff]’s injuries and the injuries were a reasonably foreseeable consequence

of [name of defendant]’s failure to act; and

Sixth: That [name of defendant] acted under color of law. [The parties

have agreed that [name of defendant] acted under color of law, so you should

accept that as a proven fact.]

[For the sixth element, you must decide whether [name of defendant]

acted under color of law. A government official acts “under color” of law when

acting within the limits of lawful authority. [He/She] also acts under color of

law when [he/she] claims to be performing an official duty but [his/her] acts are

outside the limits of lawful authority and abusive in manner, or [he/she] acts

in a way that misuses [his/her] power and is able to do so only because [he/she]

is an official.]

If you find [name of plaintiff] has proved each of the facts [he/she]

must prove, you must then decide the issue of [name of plaintiff]’s damages. If

you find that [name of plaintiff] has not proved each of these facts, then you

must find for [name of defendant].

NOTE: Model Jury Interrogatory Forms may be found in the

appendices after the last civil rights jury instruction (Pattern Instruction 5.13) for

use in actions brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Three types of Model Jury

Interrogatory Forms are provided: (A) a simplified Interrogatory Form for use in

3

most civil rights actions; (B) an Interrogatory Form for use in actions that do not

require application of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, and (C) an

Interrogatory Form for use in actions that do require application of the Prison

Litigation Reform Act.

Provenance

Source
ca11.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
civil-2025-12
Content hash
01e93250afe8bb40519701386d3cc9627ee4e85d5c1a30a6d6c06de89a01d114
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.