US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 4.20
USERRA – 38 U.S.C. § 4312 – Reemployment
In this case, [name of plaintiff] makes a claim under the Uniformed Services
Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, also called USERRA.
Under USERRA, employees who leave civilian jobs to serve in the military
are entitled to reemployment rights and benefits upon their return from service.
[Name of plaintiff] claims [he/she] was entitled to be reemployed by [name of
defendant]. [Name of defendant] denies [name of plaintiff] was entitled to such a
right.
To succeed on [his/her] claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove each of the
following facts by a preponderance of the evidence:
First: [Name of plaintiff] left employment with [name of
defendant] to perform service in a uniformed service;
Second: [Name of plaintiff] gave [name of defendant] advance notice
of the service – unless it was impossible or unreasonable to
give notice;
[Third: The cumulative length of [name of plaintiff]’s absences from
employment with [name of defendant] due to periods of
military service was not more than five years;]
Fourth: After completing the service, [name of plaintiff] timely
returned to [name of defendant] or applied for reemployment
with [name of defendant]; and
Fifth: [Name of plaintiff] was separated from the service under
honorable conditions.
[Name of Armed Forces Branch/Army National Guard/Air National Guard]
is a “uniformed service.”
For the first element, “service in a uniformed service” means the voluntary
or involuntary performance of duty. It includes:
(a) active duty;
(b) active duty for training;
(c) initial active duty for training;
(d) inactive duty training;
(e) full-time National-Guard duty;
(f) a person’s absence from a position of employment for an
examination to determine the person’s fitness to perform any of
these duties; and
(g) a person’s absence from employment for performing funeral -
honors duty.
For the second element, if you find that [name of plaintiff] left employment
with [name of defendant] to perform service in a uniformed service, you must
decide whether [name of plaintiff] gave [name of defendant] advance notice of
[his/her] obligation [or was excused from giving notice because it was impossible
or unreasonable]. The advance notice to [name of defendant] of [name of
plaintiff]’s obligation or intention to perform military service can be written or
oral, and it may be informal.
[For the third element, add up the number of days or months that [name of
plaintiff] was absent from his employment with [name of defendant].]
For the [third/fourth] element, a “timely return” depends on how long [name
of plaintiff]’s period of service was.
[Period of service less than 31 days or for a period of any length for the
purpose of a fitness examination: To establish a timely return for purposes of
reemployment, [name of plaintiff] must prove by a preponderance of the evidence
that [he/she] reported to [name of defendant] no later than the start of the first full
regularly scheduled work period on the first full calendar day after [he/she]
completed service – except that [he/she] is not required to report before eight hours
past the time needed for safe transportation from the place of service to [his/her]
home. For example, if [name of plaintiff] completes [his/her] service, travels home,
and arrives at ten o’clock in the evening, [he/she] cannot be required to report to
[name of defendant] earlier than six o’clock the next morning- eight hours after
arriving home.
If it is impossible or unreasonable for [name of plaintiff] to report within that
period through no fault of [his/her] own, [he/she] must report to the employer as
soon as possible after the eight-hour period.]
[Period of service more than 30 days but less than 181 days: To establish
a timely return for purposes of reemployment, [name of plaintiff] must prove by a
preponderance of the evidence that [he/she] applied to return to work no later than
14 days after [he/she] completed the military service. The application that [name of
plaintiff] submitted does not need to follow any particular format and [he/she] may
make it orally or in writing. If it is impossible or unreasonable for [name of
plaintiff] to apply within 14 days through no fault of [his/her] own, [he/she] must
submit the application to [name of defendant] not later than the next full calendar
day after it becomes possible to do so.]
[Period of service more than 180 days: To establish a timely return for
purposes of reemployment, [name of plaintiff] must prove by a preponderance of
the evidence that [he/she] applied to return to work no later than 90 days after
[he/she] completed the military service. The application that [name of plaintiff]
submitted does not need to follow any particular format and [he/she] may make it
orally or in writing.]
[Prompt reemployment: To prove that [name of defendant] violated the
reemployment requirement of USERRA, [name of plaintiff] must prove by a
preponderance of the evidence that [name of defendant] failed to offer [him/her]
reinstatement as soon as was practicable under the circumstances. Uncertainty or
mistake about what rights USERRA grants – on the part of either [name of
plaintiff] or [name of defendant] – does not affect USERRA’s prompt
reinstatement requirement. [Name of defendant] must prove that unusual
circumstances justified or excused any delay in [name of plaintiff]’s
reemployment.]
SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES TO THE JURY
Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence:
1. That [name of plaintiff] left employment with [name of defendant]
to perform service in a uniformed service?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “No,” this ends your deliberations, and your
foreperson should sign and date the last page of this verdict form. If your
answer is “Yes,” go to the next question.
2. [That [name of plaintiff] gave [name of defendant] advance notice
of the service/That it was impossible or unreasonable for [name of plaintiff]
to give advance notice of the service]?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “No,” this ends your deliberations, and your
foreperson should sign and date the last page of this verdict form. If your
answer is “Yes,” go to the next question.
[3. That the cumulative length of [name of plaintiff]’s absences from
employment with [name of defendant] because of military service does not
exceed five years?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “No,” this ends your deliberations, and your
foreperson should sign and date the last page of this verdict form. If your
answer is “Yes,” go to the next question.]
4. That [name of plaintiff] timely returned to [name of defendant] or
timely applied for reemployment with [name of defendant] after completing
the service?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “No,” this ends your deliberations, and your
foreperson should sign and date the last page of this verdict form. If your
answer is “Yes,” go to the next question.
5. That [name of plaintiff] was separated from the service under
honorable conditions?
Answer Yes or No _____________
SO SAY WE ALL.
___________________________
Foreperson’s Signature
DATE: ___________________
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- civil-2025-12
- Content hash
8c8b073600d8bbb1077a896dc42d2020756d1d24df30bc16b1ccfaf5633d7435
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.