Bindinglaw

US-CA11 · jury_instructions

11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 3.7.1

Responsibility for Proof – Plaintiff’s Claim[s], Cross Claims,

activein force · 2025-09-01 – presentact-effective-date

Counterclaims – Preponderance of the Evidence

In this case it is the responsibility of the [Plaintiff] [party bringing any

claim] to prove every essential part of [his/her/its] claim[s] by a “preponderance of

the evidence.” This is sometimes called the “burden of proof” or the “burden of

persuasion.”

A “preponderance of the evidence” simply means an amount of evidence

that is enough to persuade you that [the Plaintiff’s] [the party’s] claim is more

likely true than not true.

If the proof fails to establish any essential part of a claim or contention by a

preponderance of the evidence, you should find against the [Plaintiff] [party

making that claim or contention].

[When more than one claim is involved, you should consider each claim

separately.]

In deciding whether any fact has been proved by a preponderance of the

evidence, you may consider the testimony of all of the witnesses, regardless of who

may have called them, and all of the exhibits received in evidence, regardless of

who may have produced them.

If the proof fails to establish any essential part of [the Plaintiff’s] [a party’s]

claim[s] by a preponderance of the evidence, you should find for the [Defendant]

[Counter-Defendant, Cross-Claim Defendant] as to that claim.

2

Provenance

Source
ca11.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
civil-2025-09
Content hash
72a55ab32445da82841417fc0b0e90cc254431076d2f161096b2810e8bfd6192
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 3.7.1 · binding.law