US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 11.2
Trade Secrets – Affirmative Defense – Statute of Limitations
[Name of defendant] claims that [name of plaintiff] ’s lawsuit was not filed
within the time set by law , which is within three years after the claimed
misappropriation occurred. To succeed on this defense, [name of defendant] must
prove that the claimed misappropriation of [name of plaintiff]’s trade secret(s)
occurred before [insert date three years before date of filing]. The law considers a
continuing misappropriation as a single misappropriation. Therefore, you should
determine whether the claimed misappropriation is a single misappropriation that
began before or after [insert date three years before date of filing].
However, the lawsuit was still filed by [name of plaintiff] on time if [name
of plaintiff] proves that before [insert date three years before date of filing], [name
of plaintiff] did not discover, nor with reasonable diligence should have
discovered, the claimed misappropriation of [name of plaintiff]’s trade secret(s).
SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES TO THE JURY
Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that:
1. [Name of plaintiff] discovered, or should have discovered through
the exercise of reasonable diligence, before [insert date three years before
the date of filing] about the claimed misappropriation?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes ,” this ends your deliberations, and your
foreperson should sign and date the last page of this verdict form. If your
answer is “No,” go to the next question.
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- civil-2025-12
- Content hash
fbbd5fe8251930b01ff63c22ffd57b9eddfa6628e45294f9104512be5d2d8627
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.