US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 10.3
Defenses to Claim of Infringement of a Trademark
If you find that [name of plaintiff] has shown a likelihood of confusion, you
must consider [name of defendant’s] defenses. [Name of defendant] claims that
[name of defendant] is not liable to [name of plaintiff] for trademark infringement
because one or more of the following defenses exist. [Name of defendant] has the
burden of proving [a] defense[s] to trademark infringement by a preponderance of
the evidence.
[The following instruction should be given in cases in which defendant claims that
the use of plaintiff’s trademark is a nominative fair use:
Nominative fair use is a defense to a claim of trademark infringement. Under
this defense, [name of defendant] may use [name of plaintiff]’s trademark to refer
to [name of plaintiff]’s goods, but [name of defendant] may not use [name of
plaintiff]’s trademark to refer to [name of defendant]’s own goods. You must find
that [name of defendant]’s use of the trademark was not infringing if [name of
defendant] proves by a preponderance of the evidence that [his/her/its] use of
[name of plaintiff]’s trademark meets the following elements:
1. [Name of plaintiff]’s trademark is the only name, term, or symbol
reasonably available to describe [name of defendant]’s goods;
2. [Name of defendant] does not attempt to capitalize on consumer
confusion or to appropriate the prestige of [name of plaintiff]’s
trademark; and
3. [Name of defendant]’s use of [name of plaintiff]’s trademark does
not identify [name of plaintiff] as the source of [name of
defendant]’s goods.]
[The following instruction should be given in cases in which defendant claims that
[his/her/its] use of plaintiff’s trademark is descriptive fair use:
Descriptive fair use is a defense to a claim of trademark infringement.
[Name of defendant] is not liable for infringement if [he/she/it] proves by a
preponderance of the evidence that [his/her/its] use of [name of plaintiff]’s
trademark is necessary to accurately describe a characteristic of [his/her/its] goods.
To establish this defense, [name of defendant] must prove that [name of plaintiff]’s
trademark is used:
1. Other than as a trademark;
2. In a descriptive sense; and
3. Fairly and in good faith – that is, [name of defendant] did not intend
to trade on the goodwill of [name of plaintiff] by creating
confusion as to the source of [name of defendant]’s goods.]
[The following instruction should be given in cases in which defendant claims that
plaintiff abandoned [his/her/its] trademark:
Abandonment of a trademark is a defense to a claim of infringement. To
prove abandonment, [name of defendant] must prove the following by a
preponderance of the evidence:
1. [Name of plaintiff] discontinued the bona fide use of [name of
plaintiff]’s trademark, and did so with the intent to not resume
[his/her/its] use in the reasonably foreseeable future. If you find
that [name of plaintiff] has not used the trademark for three
consecutive years, you may presume that [name of plaintiff] did
not intend to resume use of the trademark, but [name of plaintiff]
can rebut that presumption by producing evidence that [he/she/it]
intended to resume use; or
2. [Name of plaintiff] acted or failed to act, and as a result [name of
plaintiff]’s trademark no longer identifies the source of [name of
plaintiff]’s goods and has become a generic term for the associated
goods.]
1. [The following instruction should be given in cases in which
defendant claims to be the senior user of a mark under Section 15 of the
Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1065 (2012), in an action brought by a plaintiff
owning an incontestable federal registration on the Principal Register:
2. Prior use of a trademark in a particular geographic area is a
defense to a claim of infringement. To prove prior use, [name of defendant]
must prove the following by a preponderance of the evidence:
• [Name of defendant] began using its mark in a particular
geographic area before [name of plaintiff] began using its mark in
that area; and
• [Name of defendant]’s use of its mark in that geographic area has
been continuous since that use began.]
3. [The following instruction should be given in cases in which a
defendant claims to be an intermediate junior user of a mark under Section
33(b)(5) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1115(b)(5) (2012), in an action
brought by a plaintiff owning a federal registration on the Principal Register:
4. Prior use of a trademark in a remote geographic area before a
plaintiff’s registration issued is a defense to a claim of infringement. To
prove prior use, [name of defendant] must prove the following by a
preponderance of the evidence:
• [Name of defendant] began using its mark in a particular
geographic area before [name of plaintiff] received a federal
registration of [name of plaintiff]’s mark;
• [Name of defendant] began using its mark without knowledge of
the [name of plaintiff]’s prior use of its mark; and
• [Name of defendant] has used its mark continuously in its
geographic area since before [name of plaintiff] received a federal
registration of [name of plaintiff]’s mark.
———.———
Defenses to Claim of Infringement of a Trademark
SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES TO THE JURY
Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that:
[Use these special interrogatories if defendant is claiming that [his/her/its] use
is nominative fair use:
1. [Name of plaintiff]’s trademark is the only reasonable way to
describe [name of defendant]’s goods?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” then go to the next question. If your answer is
“No,” then go to the special interrogatories on Remedies in either the jury
charges for Infringement of Registered Trademark or Infringement of an
Unregistered Trademark.
2. [Name of defendant]’s use of [name of plaintiff]’s trademark is not
an attempt to capitalize on consumer confusion or to appropriate the prestige
of [name of plaintiff]’s trademark?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” then go to the next question. If your answer is
“No,” then go to the special interrogatories on Remedies in either the jury
charges for Infringement of Registered Trademark or Infringement of an
Unregistered Trademark.
3. [Name of defendant]’s use of [name of plaintiff]’s trademark is not
intended to identify [his/her/its] goods with the source of [name of
plaintiff]’s goods?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” then your foreperson should sign and date the
last page of this verdict form. If your answer is “No,” then go to the special
interrogatories on Remedies in either the jury charges for Infringement of
Registered Trademark or Infringement of an Unregistered Trademark.]
[Use these special interrogatories if defendant is claiming that [his/her/its] use
is descriptive fair use:
4. [Name of defendant] used [name of plaintiff]’s trademark in a way
other than as a trademark.
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” then go to the next question. If your answer is
“No,” then go to the special interrogatories on Remedies in either the jury
charges for Infringement of Registered Trademark or Infringement of an
Unregistered Trademark.
5. [Name of defendant] used [name of plaintiff]’s trademark in a
descriptive sense.
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” then go to the next question. If your answer is
“No,” then go to the special interrogatories on Remedies in either the jury
charges for Infringement of Registered Trademark or Infringement of an
Unregistered Trademark.
6. [Name of defendant] used [name of plaintiff]’s trademark in good
faith.
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” then your foreperson should sign and date the
last page of this verdict form. If your answer is “No,” then go to the special
interrogatories on Remedies in either the jury charges for Infringement of
Registered Trademark or Infringement of an Unregistered Trademark.]
[Use these special interrogatories if defendant asserts that plaintiff has
abandoned [his/her/its] trademark through nonuse:
7. [Name of plaintiff] has ceased using the trademark with the intent
to not resume [his/her/its] use in the reasonably foreseeable future?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” then your foreperson should sign and date the
last page of this verdict form. If your answer is “No,” then go to the special
interrogatories on Remedies in either the jury charges for Infringement of
Registered Trademark or Infringement of an Unregistered Trademark.]
[Use these special interrogatories if defendant asserts that plaintiff has
abandoned [his/her/its] trademark through acts or omissions causing the
mark to lose its significance as a mark:
8. Because of [name of plaintiff]’s acts or omissions, the trademark no
longer identifies the source of the goods but rather identifies the goods
themselves?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” then your foreperson should sign and date the
last page of this verdict form. If your answer is “No,” then go to the special
interrogatories on Remedies in either the jury charges for Infringement of
Registered Trademark or Infringement of an Unregistered Trademark.]
[Use these special interrogatories if defendant has asserted a counterclaim for
cancellation of plaintiff’s registered trademark registration on the basis that
plaintiff abandoned the trademark:
9. [Name of plaintiff] has abandoned [his/her/its] trademark?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” then your foreperson should sign and date the last
page of this verdict form. If your answer is “No,” then go to the special
interrogatories on Remedies in either the jury charges for Infringement of
Registered Trademark or Infringement of an Unregistered Trademark.]
[Use these special interrogatories if defendant asserts prior use under 15
U.S.C. § 1065 and plaintiff owns an incontestable registration:
10. [Name of defendant] has used its mark in a particular geographic
area since prior to the [name of plaintiff]’s use of its mark?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” then go to the next question. If your answer is
“No,” then go to the special interrogatories on Remedies in either the jury charges
for Infringement of Registered Trademark or Infringement of an Unregistered
Trademark.
11. [Name of defendant]’s use of its mark has been continuous in that
geographic area?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” your foreperson should sign and date the last page
of this verdict form. If your answer is “No,” then go to the special interrogatories
on Remedies in either the jury charges for Infringement of Registered Trademark
or Infringement of an Unregistered Trademark.]
[Use these special interrogatories if defendant asserts prior use under 15
U.S.C. § 1115(b)(5):
12. [Name of defendant] has used its mark in a particular geographic
area since prior to the [name of plaintiff]’s registration of its mark?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” then go to the next question. If your answer is
“No,” then go to the special interrogatories on Remedies in either the jury charges
for Infringement of Registered Trademark or Infringement of an Unregistered
Trademark.
13. [Name of defendant]’s use of its mark has been continuous in that that
geographic area?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” then go to the next question. If your answer is
“No,” then go to the special interrogatories on Remedies in either the jury charges
for Infringement of Registered Trademark or Infringement of an Unregistered
Trademark.
14. [Name of defendant] adopted its mark without knowledge of [name of
plaintiff]’s use of its mark?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If your answer is “Yes,” your foreperson should sign and date the last page of this
verdict form. If your answer is “No,” then go to the special interrogatories on
Remedies in either the jury charges for Infringement of Registered Trademark or
Infringement of an Unregistered Trademark.]
S
O SAY WE ALL.
___________________________
Foreperson’s Signature
DATE: ___________________
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- civil-2025-12
- Content hash
a9101c0f2093fffa1bbfcd20ed0c2354292bb9fbc74f48fb4ebd1741c9495112
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.