US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 10.1
Trademark Infringement – Registered Trademark
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] has infringed
[his/her/its] registered trademark. To prove [his/her/its] claim, [name of plaintiff]
must prove the following facts by a preponderance of the evidence:
1: [Name of plaintiff] owns a trademark that is entitled to protection; and
2: That [name of defendant] is using a mark that infringes upon [name of
plaintiff]’s trademark.
[You are instructed and must accept as a fact that [name of plaintiff] owns a
federal registration of the trademark [he/she/it] seeks to protect in this action. It is
[name of defendant]’s burden to prove that [name of plaintiff]’s trademark is
invalid.]
[This instruction should be used if the parties do not stipulate regarding a federal
registration:
You must first find that [name of plaintiff] owns a federal registration of the
trademark at issue in this case. To do this, you must find that the trademark is
covered by a registration on the Principal Register of the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office. If you do not find that [name of plaintiff] owns a federal
registration, then you must determine whether [name of plaintiff] owns a
trademark that is entitled to protection. [If it is disputed whether [name of plaintiff]
has a registered trademark, the unregistered trademark instructions also should be
given.]]
2
5.13
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- civil-2025-12
- Content hash
24a8f01ca8a4e768e0b35118b61868c4ccd61e0141a34510808288909fa7acd1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.