US-CA10 · jury_instructions
10th Cir. Crim. Pattern Jury Instr. 3.07
AGGRAVATING AND MITIGATING FACTORS
GENERALLY
Although it is left solely to you to decide whether the death
penalty should be imposed, Congress has narrowed and channeled
your discretion in specific ways, particularly by directing you to
consider and weigh aggravating and mitigating factors presented
by the case. These factors guide your deliberations by focusing on
certain circumstances surrounding the crime, [characteristics of
the victim], and personal traits, character, and background of the
defendant.
Aggravating factors are considerations that tend to support
imposition of the death penalty. The government is required to
specify the factors it relies on, and your deliberations are
constrained by its choice. Even if you believe that the evidence
reveals other aggravating factors, you may not consider them.
Mitigating factors are considerations that suggest that a
sentence of death should not be imposed. They need not justify or
excuse the defendant’s conduct, but they do suggest that a
punishment less than death may be sufficient to do justice in the
case.
Aside from the condition that the government prove at least
one statutory aggravating factor, your task is not simply to decide
whether, which, or how many aggravating and mitigating factors
are present in the case. You also must evaluate and weigh such
factors and, ultimately, make a unique individualized judgment
about the justification for and appropriateness of the death
penalty as a punishment for the defendant.
Provenance
- Source
- ca10.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-03
- Edition
- 2026-09-03
- Content hash
de0b28d45925bfa6bb465e6d821e0f8dbb87def7136030d7b39680d4e51e1b53
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.