US-CA10 · jury_instructions
10th Cir. Crim. Pattern Jury Instr. 2.96
STRUCTURING TRANSACTIONS TO EVADE
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 31 U.S.C. § 5324(a)(3)
The defendant is charged in count ————— with a violation
of 31 U.S.C. section 5324(a)(3).
This law makes it a crime to [structure] [attempt to structure]
[assist in structuring] any transaction with one or more domestic
financial institutions in order to evade the reporting requirements
of 31 U.S.C. section 5313(a).
Section 5313(a) and its implementing regulations require
the filing of a government form called a Currency Transaction
Report (CTR). Those regulations require that every domestic
financial institution that engages in a currency transaction of over
$10,000 must file a report with the Internal Revenue Service. The
institution must furnish, among other things, the identity and
address of the person engaging in the transaction, the person or
entity, if any, for whom he is acting, and the amount of the
currency transaction. The Currency Transaction Report must be
filed within 15 days of the transaction.
T o fi n d t h e d e f e n d a n t g u i l t y o f t h i s c r i m e y o u m u s t b e
convinced that the government has proved each of the following
beyond a reasonable doubt:
First: the defendant knowingly [structured] [attempted to
structure] [assisted in structuring] a currency transaction;
Second: the defendant knew of the domestic financial
institution’s legal obligation to report transactions in excess of
$10,000; and
Third: the purpose of the structured transaction was to evade
that reporting obligation.
[Fourth: the defendant violated this law while violating
another law of the United States, specifically [describe the law
mentioned in the indictment] as part of a pattern of illegal activity
involving more than $100,000 in a 12-month period.]
A person structures a transaction if that person, acting alone
or with others, conducts one or more currency transactions in any
amount, at one or more financial institutions, on one or more days,
for the purpose of evading the reporting requirements described
earlier. Structuring includes breaking down a single sum of
currency exceeding $10,000 into smaller sums, or conducting a
PATTERN CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS
306
series of currency transactions, including transactions at or below
$10,000. Illegal structuring can exist even if no transaction
exceeded $10,000 at any single financial institution on any single
day.
It is not necessary for the government to prove that a
defendant knew that structuring a transaction to avoid triggering
the filing requirements was itself illegal. The government must
prove beyond a reasonable doubt only that a defendant
[structured] [assi sted in structuring] [attempted to structure]
currency transactions with knowledge of the reporting
requirements and with the specific intent to avoid said reporting
requirements.
Provenance
- Source
- ca10.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-03
- Edition
- 2026-09-03
- Content hash
4cacca8ee432bea4eb63cc7b5265f52a475171d5e5418f060973f80bb5f9e375
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.