Bindinglaw

US-CA10 · jury_instructions

10th Cir. Crim. Pattern Jury Instr. 2.96

STRUCTURING TRANSACTIONS TO EVADE

activein force · 2026-09-03 – presentas-observed

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 31 U.S.C. § 5324(a)(3)

The defendant is charged in count ————— with a violation

of 31 U.S.C. section 5324(a)(3).

This law makes it a crime to [structure] [attempt to structure]

[assist in structuring] any transaction with one or more domestic

financial institutions in order to evade the reporting requirements

of 31 U.S.C. section 5313(a).

Section 5313(a) and its implementing regulations require

the filing of a government form called a Currency Transaction

Report (CTR). Those regulations require that every domestic

financial institution that engages in a currency transaction of over

$10,000 must file a report with the Internal Revenue Service. The

institution must furnish, among other things, the identity and

address of the person engaging in the transaction, the person or

entity, if any, for whom he is acting, and the amount of the

currency transaction. The Currency Transaction Report must be

filed within 15 days of the transaction.

T o fi n d t h e d e f e n d a n t g u i l t y o f t h i s c r i m e y o u m u s t b e

convinced that the government has proved each of the following

beyond a reasonable doubt:

First: the defendant knowingly [structured] [attempted to

structure] [assisted in structuring] a currency transaction;

Second: the defendant knew of the domestic financial

institution’s legal obligation to report transactions in excess of

$10,000; and

Third: the purpose of the structured transaction was to evade

that reporting obligation.

[Fourth: the defendant violated this law while violating

another law of the United States, specifically [describe the law

mentioned in the indictment] as part of a pattern of illegal activity

involving more than $100,000 in a 12-month period.]

A person structures a transaction if that person, acting alone

or with others, conducts one or more currency transactions in any

amount, at one or more financial institutions, on one or more days,

for the purpose of evading the reporting requirements described

earlier. Structuring includes breaking down a single sum of

currency exceeding $10,000 into smaller sums, or conducting a

PATTERN CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS

306

series of currency transactions, including transactions at or below

$10,000. Illegal structuring can exist even if no transaction

exceeded $10,000 at any single financial institution on any single

day.

It is not necessary for the government to prove that a

defendant knew that structuring a transaction to avoid triggering

the filing requirements was itself illegal. The government must

prove beyond a reasonable doubt only that a defendant

[structured] [assi sted in structuring] [attempted to structure]

currency transactions with knowledge of the reporting

requirements and with the specific intent to avoid said reporting

requirements.

Provenance

Source
ca10.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-03
Edition
2026-09-03
Content hash
4cacca8ee432bea4eb63cc7b5265f52a475171d5e5418f060973f80bb5f9e375
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.