US-CA10 · jury_instructions
10th Cir. Crim. Pattern Jury Instr. 2.73.2
MONEY LAUNDERING “STING” CONCEALING
PURPORTED PROCEEDS OF ILLEGAL ACTIVITY
18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(3)(B)
The defendant is charged in count ————— with a violation
of 18 U.S.C. section 1956(a)(3)(B).
This law makes it a crime to knowingly use [what is
represented to be the proceeds of specified unlawful activity] [what
is represented to be property used to conduct or facilitate specified
unlawful activity] to conceal or disguise the nature, location,
source, ownership or control of the property believed to be the
proceeds of specified unlawful activity.
T o fi n d t h e d e f e n d a n t g u i l t y o f t h i s c r i m e , y o u m u s t b e
convinced that the government has proved each of the following
beyond a reasonable doubt:
First: the defendant [conducted] [attempted to conduct] a
financial transaction;
Second: the financial transaction involved property that was
represented by a [law enforcement officer] [person acting at the
direction of, or with the approval of, an agent of the [specify agency
from 18 U.S.C. § 1956(e)]] to be [the proceeds of specified unlawful
activity] [property used to conduct or facilitate specified unlawful
activity];
Third: the financial transaction was believed by the defendant
to be [the proceeds of [specify unlawful activity from
18 U.S.C. § 1956(c)(7)]] [property used to conduct or facilitate
[specify unlawful activity from 18 U.S.C.
§ 1956(c)(7)]]; and
Fourth: the defendant conducted the [financial transaction]
[attempted financial transaction] with the intent to conceal or
disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, or control of
property believed to be the proceeds of [specify unlawful activity
from 18 U.S.C. § 1956(c)(7)].
PATTERN CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS
229
The term “conducts” includes initiating, concluding, or participating in initiating or
concluding, a transaction.
The term “financial transaction” means [select from the
following as appropriate]:
(A) a transaction involving the use of a financial institution
that is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate
commerce in any way or degree; or
(B) a transaction that in any way or degree affects interstate
commerce, and that involves:
(i) the movement of funds by wire or other means;
or
(ii) one or more monetary instruments; or
(iii) the transfer of title to any real property, vehicle,
vessel, or aircraft.
The term “proceeds” means any property derived from or
obtained or retained, directly or indirectly, through specified
unlawful activity, including the gross receipts of such activity.
“Interstate commerce” means commerce or travel between the
states, territories or possessions of the United States, including
the District of Columbia. It is not necessary that the defendant
have intended or anticipated an effect on interstate commerce. All
that is necessary is that the natural and probable consequence of
the acts the defendant took would be to affect interstate commerce.
Provenance
- Source
- ca10.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-03
- Edition
- 2026-09-03
- Content hash
4e39ad24ae842e8db686910668a587871d22a7f0dd185e1b0c7a56172de25072
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.