US-CA10 · jury_instructions
10th Cir. Crim. Pattern Jury Instr. 2.56
MAIL FRAUD 18 U.S.C. § 1341
The defendant is charged in count _________ with a violation
of 18 U.S.C. section 1341.
This law makes it a crime to use the mails in carrying out a
scheme to defraud [a scheme to obtain money or property by
means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or
promises] [a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible
right to honest services].
T o fi n d t h e d e f e n d a n t g u i l t y o f t h i s c r i m e y o u m u s t b e
convinced that the government has proved each of the following
beyond a reasonable doubt:
First: the defendant devised or intended to devise a scheme to
defraud, as alleged in the indictment [or describe the scheme
alleged in the indictment];
Second: the defendant acted with specific intent to defraud;
Third: the defendant mailed something [caused another
person to mail something] through the United States Postal
Service [a private or commercial interstate carrier] for the purpose
of carrying out the scheme;
Fourth : the scheme employed false or fraudulent
pretenses, representations, or promises that were material.
[Fifth: the scheme was in connection with the conduct of
telemarketing.]
or
[Fifth: the scheme was in connection with the conduct of
telemarketing and
(a) victimized ten or more persons over the age of 55, or
targeted persons over the age of 55.] or
(b) targeted persons over the age of 55.] or
[Fifth: the scheme was related to a presidentially declared
major disaster or emergency.]
or
[Fifth: the scheme affected a financial institution.]
PATTERN CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS
182
A “scheme to defraud” is conduct intended to or reasonably
calculated to deceive persons of ordinary prudence or
comprehension.
An “intent to defraud” means an intent to deceive or cheat
someone.
A representation is “false” if it is known to be untrue or is
made with reckless indifference as to its truth or falsity. A
representation would also be “false” when it constitutes a half
truth, or effectively omits or conceals a material fact, provided it
is made with intent to defraud.
A false statement is “material” if it has a natural tendency to
influence, or is capable of influencing, the decision of the person or
entity to which it is addressed.
What must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt is that the
defendant devised or intended to devise a scheme to defraud that
was substantially the same as the one alleged in the indictment,
and that the use of the mails was closely related to the scheme, in
that the defendant either mailed something or caused it to be
mailed in an attempt to execute or carry out the scheme. To
“cause” the mails to be used is to do an act with knowledge that
the use of the mails will follow in the ordinary course of business
or where such use can reasonably be foreseen even though the
defendant did not intend or request the mails to be used.
Provenance
- Source
- ca10.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-19
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
a65d975b095480095193a6b421a8e4d6cab456c096d61c2c659d8188e1b3e2f1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.