Bindinglaw

US-CA10 · jury_instructions

10th Cir. Crim. Pattern Jury Instr. 2.46.1

FALSE STATEMENT 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2)

activein force · 2026-09-03 – presentas-observed

The defendant is charged in count ————— with a violation

of 18 U.S.C. section 1001(a)(2).

This law makes it a crime to knowingly and willfully make a

[false] [fictitious] [fraudulent] statement or representation

concerning a material fact within the jurisdiction of the [executive]

[legislative] [judicial] branch of the United States.

T o fi n d t h e d e f e n d a n t g u i l t y o f t h i s c r i m e y o u m u s t b e

convinced that the government has proved each of the following

beyond a reasonable doubt:

First: the defendant made a [false] [fictitious] [fraudulent]

statement or representation to the government; specifically [as

described in indictment];

Second: the defendant made the statement knowing it was

false;

Third: the defendant made the statement willfully, that is

deliberately, voluntarily and intentionally;

Fourth: the statement was made in a matter within the

jurisdiction of the [executive] [legislative] [judicial] branch of the

United States; and

Fifth: the statement was material to [name government

entity].

A fact is “material” if it has a natural tendency to influence or

is capable of influencing a decision of [name of government entity].

It is not necessary that [government entity] was in fact

influenced in any way.

Provenance

Source
ca10.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-03
Edition
2026-09-03
Content hash
d152cb0023827949137ce72a2162aba1f3c0a342f572f8e0ea7f921acd958f90
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.