US-CA10 · jury_instructions
10th Cir. Crim. Pattern Jury Instr. 2.37
INTERSTATE TRANSMISSION OF EXTORTIONATE
COMMUNICATION 18 U.S.C. § 875(b)
The defendant is charged in count ————— with a violation
of 18 U.S.C. section 875(b).
This law makes it a crime to transmit an extortionate
communication in interstate or foreign commerce.
T o fi n d t h e d e f e n d a n t g u i l t y o f t h i s c r i m e y o u m u s t b e
convinced that the government has proved each of the following
beyond a reasonable doubt:
First: the defendant knowingly transmitted a communication
containing a threat to [kidnap any person] [injure the person of
another];
Second: the defendant transmitted the communication with
intent to extort [money] [other thing of value];
Third: the communication was transmitted in interstate or
foreign commerce.
A “threat” is a serious statement expressing intent to [kidnap
any person] [injure the person of another], which, under the
circumstances, would cause apprehension in a reasonable person,
as distinguished from mere political argument, idle talk,
exaggeration, or something said in a joking manner. It is not
necessary that the defendant intended to carry out the threat, nor
is it necessary that the defendant had the ability to carry out the
threat.
To “extort” means to wrongfully induce someone else to pay
money or something of value by threatening a kidnapping or
injury if such payment is not made.
The term “thing of value” is used in the everyday, ordinary
meaning and is not limited to money or tangible things with an
identifiable price tag.
Provenance
- Source
- ca10.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-19
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
1e69d27003b76baa4d75d007584828e59ad4473126a1bab5eb19bac448f3400b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.