US-CA10 · jury_instructions
10th Cir. Crim. Pattern Jury Instr. 2.24.1
IMPORTATION, POSSESSION OR CONCEALMENT
OF COUNTERFEIT OBLIGATIONS OR SECURITIES
18 U.S.C. § 472
The defendant is charged in count ————— with a violation
of 18 U.S.C. section 472.
This law makes it a crime to, with intent to defraud, bring into
the United States, or keep in possession or conceal, any falsely
made, forged, counterfeited, or altered obligation or other security
of the United States.
[Name security or obligation] is an obligation or security of
the United States within the meaning of that law.
T o fi n d t h e d e f e n d a n t g u i l t y o f t h i s c r i m e y o u m u s t b e
convinced that the government has proved each of the following
beyond a reasonable doubt:
First: the defendant [brought into the United States] [kept in
his possession] [concealed], [falsely made] [forged] [counterfeit]
[altered] [name obligation or security];
Second: the defendant knew that the [name obligation or
security] was [falsely made] [forged] [counterfeit] [altered];
and
Third: the defendant did so with intent to defraud.
An item is “counterfeit” if it bears such a likeness to a genuine
item as is calculated to deceive an unsuspecting person of ordinary
observation and care.
To act with “intent to defraud” means to act with intent to
cheat or deceive. It does not matter, however, whether anyone was
in fact cheated or deceived.
Provenance
- Source
- ca10.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-03
- Edition
- 2026-09-03
- Content hash
d806e147c2ff0fa8011a0a20907a8589adb620b27e5bb40eabff735c0138dad5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.