Bindinglaw

US-CA10 · jury_instructions

10th Cir. Crim. Pattern Jury Instr. 2.22

WITHDRAWAL INSTRUCTION

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

The defendant has raised the affirmative defense of

withdrawal from the conspiracy.

I f y o u h a v e fi r s t f o u n d t h e d e f e n d a n t w a s a m e m b e r o f t h e

conspiracy charged in count —————, then you must determine

whether the defendant thereafter withdrew from the conspiracy.

In order to find that the defendant withdrew from the

conspiracy, you must be convinced that the defendant has proven

by a preponderance of the evidence that he took an affirmative

step to either defeat the purpose of the conspiracy, either by

reporting to t he authorities or communicating to his

coconspirators that he was no longer participating in the

conspiracy.

Provenance

Source
ca10.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-19
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
0ac68584396817903ef23f39bf3248119555063b30aa74678071a468d40b1d84
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
10th Cir. Crim. Pattern Jury Instr. 2.22 · binding.law