US-CA10 · jury_instructions
10th Cir. Crim. Pattern Jury Instr. 2.19.2
CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD
18 U.S.C. § 371 (SECOND CLAUSE)
The defendant is charged in count ————— of the indictment
with a violation of 18 U.S.C. section 371.
This law makes it a crime to conspire to defraud the United
States by __________ (describe means, e.g. impairing, obstructing,
or defeating the lawful function of the Internal Revenue Service in
the ascertainment, assessment, or collection of income taxes due).
The word “defraud” here is not limited to its ordinary
meaning of cheating the government out of money or property; it
includes impairing, obstructing, defeating, or interfering with the
lawful function of the government or one of its agencies by
dishonest means.
To find the defendant guilty of this crime you must be
convinced that the government has proved each of the following
beyond a reasonable doubt:
First: the defendant agreed with at least one other person
to defraud the government or one of its agencies by _____________
(describe), as charged in the indictment.
Second: one of the conspirators engaged in at least one overt
act furthering the conspiracy’s objective.
Third: the defendant knew the essential objective of the
conspiracy.
Fourth: the defendant knowingly and voluntarily
participated in the conspiracy.
Fifth: there was interdependence among the members of the
conspiracy; that is, the members, in some way or manner, intended
to act together for their shared mutual benefit within the scope of
the conspiracy charged.
Provenance
- Source
- ca10.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-19
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
d91531d8edd93e97eedc087f5a20452317ba08986ac7bc67bb1205b102d34658
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.