Bindinglaw

TX · rules

Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 15.08

Prior Discipline Orders

activein force · 2024-10-01 – presentact-effective-date

Absent aggravating or mitigating circumstances, and upon application of the factors set out in Rule

15.02, the following sanctions are generally appropriate in cases involving prior discipline.

1. Disbarment is generally appropriate when a Respondent:

(a) intentionally or knowingly violates the terms of a prior disciplinary order

and such violation causes injury or potential injury to a client, the public,

the legal system, or the profession; or

(b) has been suspended for the same or similar misconduct, and intentionally or

knowingly engages in further similar acts of misconduct that cause injury

or potential injury to a client, the public, the legal system, or the profession.

2. Suspension is generally appropriate when a Respondent has been reprimanded for

the same or similar misconduct and engages in further similar acts of misconduct

that cause injury or potential injury to a client, the public, the legal system, or the

profession.

3. Public reprimand is generally appropriate when a Respondent:

(a) negligently violates the terms of a prior disciplinary order and such violation

causes injury or potential injury to a client, the public, the legal system, or

the profession; or

(b) has received a private reprimand for the same or similar misconduct and

engages in further similar acts of misconduct that cause injury or potential

injury to a client, the public, the legal system, or the profession.

4. A private reprimand is generally not an appropriate sanction when a Respondent

violates the terms of a prior disciplinary order or when a Respondent has engaged

in the same or similar misconduct in the past.

5. A private reprimand should not be utilized when a Respondent:

(a) has received a private reprimand within the preceding five-year period for

a violation of the same disciplinary rule; or

(b) has engaged in misconduct involving theft, misapplication of fiduciary

property, or the failure to return, after demand, a clearly unearned fee; or

(c) has engaged in misconduct involving the failure of a prosecutor to make

timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the

prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigate the

offense.

6. A private reprimand is not an available sanction in a Disciplinary Action.

Provenance

Source
txcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
b175404aa98b0071e9c9ed0156e5cd526f57c65ca34aa890691dbc161a8afde6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 15.08 — Prior Discipline Orde… · binding.law