TX · rules

Tex. R. Civ. P. 194

Requ Ired Disclosures in Suits not Governed by the Family Code

activein force · 2026-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

194.1 Duty to Disclose; Production.

(a) Duty to Disclose. Except in a suit governed by the Family Code, as exempted by Rule

194.2(c), or as otherwise agreed by the parties or ordered by the court, a party must, without

awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties the information or material

described in Rule 194.2, 194.3, and 194.4.

(b) Production. If a party does not produce copies of all responsive documents, electronically

stored information, and tangible things with the response, the response must state a

reasonable time and method for the production of these items. The responding party must

produce the items at the time and in the method stated, unless otherwise agreed by the

parties or ordered by the court, and must provide the requesting party a reasonable

opportunity to inspect them.

194.2 Initial Disclosures.

(a) Time for Initial Disclosures. A party must make the initial disclosures within 30 days

after the filing of the first answer or general appearance unless a different time is set by the

parties’ agreement or court order. A party that is first served or otherwise joined after the

filing of the first answer or general appearance must make the initial disclosures within 30

days after being served or joined, unless a different time is set by the parties’ agreement or

court order.

(b) Content. Without awaiting a discovery request, a party must provide to the other parties:

(1) the correct names of the parties to the lawsuit;

(2) the name, address, and telephone number of any potential parties;

(3) the legal theories and, in general, the factual bases of the responding party's claims

or defenses (the responding party need not marshal all evidence that may be offered

at trial);

(4) the amount and any method of calculating economic damages;

(5) the name, address, and telephone number of persons having knowledge of relevant

facts, and a brief statement of each identified person's connection with the case;

(6) a copy–or a description by category and location –of all documents, electronically

stored information, and tangible things that the responding party has in its

possession, custody, or control, and may use to support its claims or defenses,

unless the use would be solely for impeachment;

(7) any indemnity and insuring agreements described in Rule 192.3(f);

(8) any settlement agreements described in Rule 192.3(g);

(9) any witness statements described in Rule 192.3(h);

(10) in a suit alleging physical or mental injury and damages from the occurrence that

is the subject of the case, all medical records and bills that are reasonably related to

the injuries or damages asserted or, in lieu thereof, an authorization permitting th e

disclosure of such medical records and bills;

(11) in a suit alleging physical or mental injury and damages from the occurrence that

is the subject of the case, all medical records and bills obtained by the responding

party by virtue of an authorization furnished by the requesting party; and

(12) the name, address, and telephone number of any person who may be designated as

a responsible third party.

from initial disclosure, but a court may order the parties to make particular disclosures and

set the time for disclosure:

(1) an action for review on an administrative record;

(2) a forfeiture action arising from a state statute;

(3) a petition for habeas corpus;

(4) an action involving domestic violence; and

(5) an action on appeal from a justice court.

194.3 Testifying Expert Disclosures.

In addition to the disclosures required by Rule 194.2, a party must disclose to the other parties

testifying expert information as provided by Rule 195.

194.4 Pretrial Disclosures.

(a) In General. In addition to the disclosures required by Rule 194.2 and 194.3, a party must

provide to the other parties and promptly file the following information about the evidence

that it may present at trial other than solely for impeachment:

(1) the name and, if not previously provided, the address, and telephone number of

each witness–separately identifying those the party expects to present and those it

may call if the need arises; and

(2) a list identifying each document or other exhibits, including summaries of other

evidence–separately identifying those items the party expects to offer and those it

may offer if the need arises.

(b) Time for Pretrial Disclosures. Unless the court orders otherwise, these disclosures must

be made at least 30 days before trial.

194.5 No Objection or Assertion of Work Product.

No objection or assertion of work product is permitted to a disclosure under this rule.

194.6 Certain Responses Not Admissible.

A disclosure under Rule 194.2(b)(3) and (4) that has been changed by an amended or supplemental

response is not admissible and may not be used for impeachment.

History

Notes and Comments Comment to 1999 change: 1. Disclosure is designed to afford parties basic discovery of specific categories of information, not automatically in every case, but upon request, without preparation of a lengthy inquiry, and without objection or assertion of work product. In those extrem ely rare cases when information ordinarily discoverable should be protected, such as when revealing a person’s residence might result in harm to the person, a party may move for protection. A party may assert any applicable privileges other than work produ ct using the procedures of Rule 193.3 applicable to other written discovery. Otherwise, to fail to respond fully to a request for disclosure would be an abuse of the discovery process. 2. Rules 194.2(c) and (d) permit a party further inquiry into another’s legal theories and factual claims than is often provided in notice pleadings. So- called “contention interrogatories” are used for the same purpose. Such interrogatories are not properly used to require a party to marshal evidence or brief legal issues. Paragraphs (c) and (d) are intended to require disclosure of a party’s basic assertions, whether in prosecution of claims or in defense. Thus, for example, a plaintiff would be required to disclose that he or she claimed damages suffered in a car wreck caused by defendant’s negligence in speeding, and would be required to state how loss of past earnings and future earning capacity was calculated, but would not be required to state the speed at which defendant was allegedly driving. Paragraph (d) does not require a party, either a plaintiff or a defendant, to state a method of calculating non-economic damages, such as for mental anguish. In the same example, defendant would be required to di sclose his or her denial of the speeding allegation and any basis for contesting the damage calculations. 3. Responses under Rule 194.2(c) and (d) that have been amended or supplemented are inadmissible and cannot be used for impeachment, but other evidence of changes in position is not likewise barred. Comment to 2021 change: Rule 194 is amended to implement section 22.004(h- 1) of the Texas Government Code. Rule 194 is amended based on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) to require disclosure of basic discovery automatically, without awaiting a discovery request. A party is not excused from making its disclosures because it has not fully investigated the case or because it challenges the sufficiency of another party’s disclosures or because another party has not made its disclosures. As with other written discovery responses, required disclosures must be signed under Rule 191.3, complete under Rule 193.1, served under rule 191.5, and timely amended or supplemented under Rule 193.5. Comment to 2023 change: Rule 194 is amended to implement chapter 301 of the Family Code.

Provenance

Source: txcourts.gov
Retrieved: 2026-09-15
Edition: 2026-09-14
Content hash: fb2adb7fbd7c1b2d373415ff1eb1e681ae659bbb7eef335daf137d440a00f0c1

View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs