TX · rules
Tex. R. App. P. 69.3
Improvident Grant of Review
If, after granting discretionary review, five judges
are of the opinion that discretionary review should not
have been granted, the case will be dismissed.
History
Notes and Comments Comment to 1997 change: This is form er subdivisions (k) and (l) of Rule 202. Internal procedures of the Court are deleted. Provisions are added in 69.4(a) and (b) for the clerk to send notice of the granting, refusal, or dismissal of a petition for discretionary review. Other nonsubstantive changes are made.
Provenance
- Source
- txcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
c35bb436e0608d4527aab43f5132ea450b3effef0aec10b9c95918435ed13061
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.