Bindinglaw

TX · rules

Tex. R. App. P. 47.7

Citation of Unpublished Opinions

activein force · 2026-02-06 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Criminal Cases. Opinions and memorandum

opinions not designated for publication by

the court of appeals under these or prior rules

have no precedential value but may be cited

with the notation, “(not designated for

publication).”

(b) Civil Cases. Opinions and memorandum

opinions designated “do not publish” under

these rules by the courts of appeals prior to

January 1, 2003 have no precedential value

but may be cited with the notation, “(not

designated for publication).” If an opinion or

memorandum opinion issued on or after that

date is erroneously designated “do not

publish,” the erroneous designation will not

affect the precedential value of the decision.

History

Notes and Comments Comment to 1997 change: This is former Rule 90. Subdivision 47.1 makes clear that a memorandum opinion should not be any longer than necessary. Subdivision 47.5 is amended to make clear that only justices who participated in the decision may file an opinion in the case. Judges who are not on a panel may file an opinion only in respect to a hearing or rehearing en banc. Former Rule 90(h), regarding publication of opinions after the Supreme Court grants review, is repealed. Comment to 2002 change: The rule is substantively changed to discontinue the use of the “do not publish” designation in civil cases, to require that all opinions of the court of appeals be made available to public reporting services, and to remove prospectively any prohibition against the citation of opinions as authority in civil cases. The rule favors the use of “memorandum opinions” designated as such except in certain types of cases but does not change other requirements, such as those in Pool v. Ford Motor Co., 715 S.W.2d 629, 635-636 (Tex. 1986). An opinion previously designated “do not publish” has no precedential value but may be cited. The citation must include the notation, “(not designated for publication).” Of course, whenever an opinion not readily available is cited, copies should be furnished to the court and opposing counsel. Comment to 2008 change: Effective January 1, 2003, Rule 47 was amended to prospectively discontinue designating opinions in civil cases as either “published” or “unpublished.” Subdivision 47.7 is revised to clarify that, with respect to civil cases, only opinions issued prior to the 2003 amendment and affirmatively designated “ do not publish” should be considered “unpublished” cases lacking precedential value. All opinions and memorandum opinions in civil cases issued after the 2003 amendment have precedential value. The provisions governing citation of unpublished opinions in criminal cases are substantively unchanged. Subdivisions 47.2 and 47.7 are amended to clarify that memorandum opinions are subject to those rules.

Provenance

Source
txcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
63c4153808f15e589400d84547e050f9951beba31366cd81acc071df31a1cda0
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.7 — Citation of Unpublished Opinio… · binding.law