Bindinglaw

TX · rules

Tex. R. App. P. 4.5

No Notice of Judgment or Order of Appellate Court; Effect on Time to File Certain Documents

activein force · 2026-02-06 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Additional Time to File Documents. A party

may move for additional time to file a

motion for rehearing or en banc

reconsideration in the court of appeals, a

petition for review, or a petition for

discretionary review, if the party did not —

until after the time expired for filing the

document—either receive notice of the

judgment or order from the clerk or acquire

actual knowledge of the rendition of the

judgment or order.

(b) Procedure to Gain Additional Time. The

motion must state the earliest date when the

party or the party's attorney received notice

or acquired actual knowledge that the

judgment or order had been rendered. The

motion must be filed within 15 days of that

date but in no event more than 90 da ys after

the date of the judgment or order.

(c) Where to File.

(1) A motion for additional time to file a

motion for rehearing or en banc

reconsideration in the court of appeals

must be filed in and ruled on by the court

of appeals in which the case is pending.

(2) A motion for additional time to file a

petition for review must be filed in and

ruled on by the Supreme Court.

(3) A motion for additional time to file a

petition for discretionary review must be

filed in and ruled on by the Court of

Criminal Appeals.

(d) Order of the Court. If the court finds that

the motion for additional time was

timely filed and the party did not —

within the time for filing the motion for

rehearing or en banc reconsideration,

petition for review, or petition for

discretionary review, as the case may

be—receive the notice or have actual

knowledge of the judgment or order, the

court must grant the motion. The time

for filing the document will begin to run

on the date when the court grants the

motion.

History

Notes and Comments Comment to 1997 change: This is former Rule 5. Paragraph 4.1(b) is added. Former paragraph (b)(1) is omitted because it is covered by other provisions of the rules. Former paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) are omitted because they are duplicative of provisions in the Rules of Civil Procedure, which prescribes the applicable procedure. The phrase “modified, corrected or reformed in any respect” in paragraph 4.3(a) is changed to “modified in any respect,” but no change in substance is intended. Former subdivision (e) regarding notice of judgment by the court of appeals is moved to Rule 12.6. Subdivision 4.5 is revised and now makes clear that the court must grant the motion for additional time if the court finds that the party did not receive the notice or acquire actual knowledge in time. Other changes are made throughout the rule. Comment to 2002 change: Subdivision 4.5 is amended to clarify that a party may obtain additional time to file documents when the party fails to receive notice not only of an appellate court judgment, but of an appellate court order - such as one denying a motion for rehearing - that triggers the appeal period. Comment to 2007 change: Subdivision 4.5 is changed, consistent with other changes in the rules, to specifically address a motion for en banc reconsideration and treat it as a motion for rehearing. Comment to 2018 change: Rule 4.6 is intended to provide redress for criminal defendants who are entitled to appeal trial court rulings made pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 64, but receive late or no notice of the rulings. The rule allows a defendant additional time to file a notice of appeal when neither the defendant nor the defendant’s attorney received notice or acquired actual knowledge of the signing of the appealable order within the first 20 days after the signing. The rule is based on the framework of Rule of Appellate Procedure 4.2 and Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 306a, but is intended to apply only in the limited context of appealable rulings on Chapter 64 motions. The term “sworn” in Rule 4.6 includes the use of an unsworn declaration made under penalty of perjury. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 132.001. If a trial judge grants a defendant’s motion for additional time filed under this rule, the court of appeals may treat the defendant’s late- filed notice of appeal as timely or treat the motion for additional time itself as a notice of appeal for the purpose of determining compliance with Rules 25.2 and 26.2.

Provenance

Source
txcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
ff9a65b1be0bc17b5f6402486a4999a7d6e542bc8f0b6ed933384578c0584349
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.