TX · rules
Tex. R. App. P. 38.2
Appellee’s Brief
(a) Form of Brief.
(1) An appellee’s brief must conform to the
requirements of Rule 38.1, except that:
(A) the list of parties and counsel is not
required unless necessary to
supplement or correct the
appellant’s list;
(B) the appellee’s brief need not include
a statement of the case, a statement
of the issues presented, or a
statement of facts, unless the
appellee is dissatisfied with that
portion of the appellant’s brief; and
(C) the appendix to the appellee’s brief
need not contain any item already
contained in an appendix filed by
the appellant.
(2) When practicable, the appellee’ s brief
should respond to the appellant’s issues
or points in the order the appellant
presented those issues or points.
(b) Cross-Points.
(1) Judgment Notwithstanding the Ver dict.
When the trial court renders judgment
notwithstanding the verdict on one or
more questions, the appellee must bring
forward by cross-point any issue or point
that would have vitiated the verdict or
that would have prevented an affirmance
of the judgment if the trial court had
rendered judgment on the verdict.
Failure to bring forward by cross-point
an issue or point that would vitiate the
verdict or prevent an affirmance of the
judgment waives that complaint.
Included in this requirement is a point
that:
(A) the verdict or one or more jury
findings have insuffic ient
evidentiary support or are against
the overwhelming preponderance of
the evidence as a matter of fact; or
(B) the verdict should be set aside
because of improper argument of
counsel.
(2) When Evidentiary Hearing Needed.
The appellate court must remand a case
to the trial court to take evidence if:
(A) the appellate court has sustained a
point raised by the appellant; and
(B) the appellee raised a cross-point that
requires the taking of additional
evidence.
History
Notes and Comments Comment to 1997 change: This is former Rule 74. The rule is substantially rewritten. Paragraph 38. 1(e) now specifically allows a party to either present issues or points of error. Paragraphs 38.1(f) and (g) are new and require a brief to include a statement of facts and summary of the argument. Paragraph 38.2(b) is new and gives specific requirements for cross-points. See also TEX. R. CIV. P. 324(c). Subdivision 38.3 is new and provides for a reply brief. Subdivision 38.4 imposes a total brief limit of 90 pages on each party. Thus, if more than one party has filed a notice of appeal, there will be multiple appellant’s, appellee’s, and reply briefs, but each party is limited to a total of 90 pages. Subdivision 38.5 is new and provides for an appendix in cases recorded electronically in the trial court. Paragraph 38.6(b) now provides that the appellee has 30 — rather than 25 — days to file a brief. The provisions of former Rules 74(I) (Number of Copies), (j) (Briefs Typewritten or Printed), and (q) (Service of Briefs) are omitted as unnecessary. See Rule 9. Comment to 2002 change: Rule 38.6(d) is amended to clarify that an appellate court may postpone the filing of any brief, not just the appellant's brief. Comment to 2008 change: A party may choose to include a statement in the brief regarding oral argument. The optional statement does not count toward the briefing page limit.
Provenance
- Source
- txcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
354fd9ebeb738d6d22747c1c74aa8b3098dcd4d931d5600a0a9beb28892bf57d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.