TX · rules
Tex. R. App. P. 38.1
Appellant’s Brief
The appellant’s brief must, under appropriate
headings and in the order here indicated, contain the
following:
(a) Identity of Parties and Counsel. The brief
must give a complete list of all parties to the
trial court’s judgment or order appealed from,
except as otherwise provided in Rule 9.8. The
brief must also give a complete list of the
names of all counsel appearing in the trial or
appellate courts; their firm or office name at
the time of the appearance; and, for counsel
currently appearing, their mailing address,
telephone number, and email address. If new
counsel appears or if any counsel currently
appearing changes their firm or office
affiliation during the pendency of the appeal,
lead counsel for the party must notify the
clerk by filing a supplemental disclosure.
(b) Table of Contents. The brief must have a
table of contents with references to the pages
of the brief and, in civil cases, be bookmarked
to assist in locating each item. The table of
contents must indicate the subject matter of
each issue or point, or group of issues or
points.
(c) Index of Authorities. The brief must have an
index of authorities arranged alphabetically
and indicating the pages of the brief where
the authorities are cited.
(d) Statement of the Case. The brief must state
concisely the nature of the case (e.g., whether
it is a suit for damages, on a note, or involving
a murder prosecution), the course of
proceedings, and the trial court’s disposition
of the case. The statement should be
supported by record references, should
seldom exceed one-half page, and should not
discuss the facts.
(e) Any Statement Regarding Oral Argument.
The brief may include a statement explaining
why oral argument should or should not be
permitted. Any such statement must not
exceed one page and should address how the
court’s decisional process would, or would
not, be aided by oral argument. As requir ed
by Rule 39.7, any party requesting oral
argument must note that request on the front
cover of the party’s brief.
(f) Issues Presented. The brief must state
concisely all issues or points presented for
review. The statement of an issue or point
will be treated as covering every subsidiary
question that is fairly included.
(g) Statement of Facts. The brief must state
concisely and without argument the facts
pertinent to the issues or points presented. In
a civil case, the court will accept as true the
facts stated unless another party contradicts
them. The statement must be supported by
record references.
(h) Summary of the Argument. The brief must
contain a succinct, clear, and accurate
statement of the arguments made in the body
of the brief. This summary must not merely
repeat the issues or points presented for
review.
(i) Argument. The brief must contain a clear and
concise argument for the contentions made,
with appropriate citations to authorities and
to the record.
(j) Prayer. The brief must contain a short
conclusion that clearly states the nature of the
relief sought.
(k) Appendix in Civil Cases.
(1) Necessary Contents. The appendix must
be bookmarked to assist in locating each
item and, unless voluminous or
impracticable, must contain a copy of:
(A) the trial court’s judgment or
other appealable order from which
relief is sought;
(B) the jury charge and verdict, if any,
or the trial court’s findings of fact
and conclusions of law, if any; and
(C) the text of any rule, regulation,
ordinance, statute, constitutional
provision, or other law (excluding
case law) on which the argument is
based, and the text of any contract or
other document that is central to the
argument.
(2) Optional Contents. The appendix may
contain any other item pertinent to the
issues or points presented for review,
including copies or excerpts of relevant
court opinions, laws, documents on
which the suit was based, pleadings,
excerpts from the reporter’s record, and
similar material. Items should not be
included in the appendix to attempt to
avoid the page limits for the brief.
History
Notes and Comments Comment to 1997 change: This is former Rule 74. The rule is substantially rewritten. Paragraph 38. 1(e) now specifically allows a party to either present issues or points of error. Paragraphs 38.1(f) and (g) are new and require a brief to include a statement of facts and summary of the argument. Paragraph 38.2(b) is new and gives specific requirements for cross-points. See also TEX. R. CIV. P. 324(c). Subdivision 38.3 is new and provides for a reply brief. Subdivision 38.4 imposes a total brief limit of 90 pages on each party. Thus, if more than one party has filed a notice of appeal, there will be multiple appellant’s, appellee’s, and reply briefs, but each party is limited to a total of 90 pages. Subdivision 38.5 is new and provides for an appendix in cases recorded electronically in the trial court. Paragraph 38.6(b) now provides that the appellee has 30 — rather than 25 — days to file a brief. The provisions of former Rules 74(I) (Number of Copies), (j) (Briefs Typewritten or Printed), and (q) (Service of Briefs) are omitted as unnecessary. See Rule 9. Comment to 2002 change: Rule 38.6(d) is amended to clarify that an appellate court may postpone the filing of any brief, not just the appellant's brief. Comment to 2008 change: A party may choose to include a statement in the brief regarding oral argument. The optional statement does not count toward the briefing page limit.
Provenance
- Source
- txcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
e9a8afdb3fcdf456f6c97123d225345e6cbb97ac14a447541b0a83c3955017a6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.