Bindinglaw

TX · rules

Tex. R. App. P. 16.3

Procedure for Recusal

activein force · 2026-02-06 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Motion. A party may file a motion to recuse

a justice or judge before whom the case is

pending. The motion must be filed promptly

after the party has reason to believe that the

justice or judge should not participate in

deciding the case.

(b) Decision. Before any further proceeding in

the case, the challenged justice or judge must

either remove himself or herself from all

participation in the case or certify the matter

to the entire court, which will decide the

motion by a majority of the remaining judges

sitting en banc. The challenged justice or

judge must not sit with the remainder of the

court to consider the motion as to him or her.

(c) Appeal. An order of recusal is not reviewable,

but the denial of a recusal motion is

reviewable.

History

Notes and Comments Comment to 1997 change: Former Rules 15 and 15a are merged. Former Rule 15a appears as subdivision 16.2. For grounds for disqualification, reference is made to the Constitution and statutes rather than the Rules of Civil Procedure. The procedure for disqualification is not specified. The nature of prior participation in a proceeding that requires recusal is clarified. Former subdivision (b) of Rule 15, requiring service of the motion, is omitted as unnecessary. The remaining subdivisions of former Rule 15 are contained in subdivision 16.3. Other changes are made.

Provenance

Source
txcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
22f8610fdee70e06aadc682ba73d09547128b838c4c3bbf45a644d492d87dee9
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.