TX · rules
Tex. Disciplinary R. Judges & Jud. Candidates 8
Review of Recommendation for the Removal or Retirement of a Judge or Prohibition of Future Judicial Service
(a) Application. This rule applies when the Commission recommends, after a
formal proceeding:
(1) the removal or retirement of a judge; or
(2) that a retired or former judge serving by assignment under Chapter 74
or 75 of the Government Code be prohibited from future service as a
judge.
(b) Appointment Request. If the Commission decides to recommend the removal or
retirement of a judge or the prohibition of future judicial service, the
Commission must promptly file with the Clerk of the Supreme Court a request
for appointment of a Review Tribunal.
(c) Appointment. The Chief Justice will select the Review Tribunal and its chair.
The Special Court of Review is composed of 7 Court of Appeals justices. The
Clerk of the Supreme Court will notify the Review Tribunal, the Commission,
and the judge of the member and chair appointments. No Commission member
may serve on the Review Tribunal.
(d) Initial Filings. After receiving notice of appointment, the Commission must
promptly file with the Clerk of the Supreme Court:
(1) a copy of its recommendation under paragraph (a), certified by the
Chairperson or Secretary of the Commission;
(2) the Commission’s findings and conclusions;
(3) the transcript of any hearing conducted as part of a formal proceeding
under Rule 5 and any testimony under oath, whether proffered at a
formal or an informal proceeding;
(4) any pleadings filed or evidence introduced as part of a formal proceeding
under Rule 5; and
(5) the special master report, if any, under Rule 5.
(e) Petition to Reject and Brief. The judge may file a petition to reject the
recommendation for removal or retirement. The petition must be filed with the
Clerk of the Supreme Court within 30 days after the Commission’s initial
filings in paragraph (d). The petition must be accompanied by a supporting
brief.
(f) Response Brief. Within 20 days after the filing of the petition and supporting
brief, the Commission must file a response brief.
(g) Briefing Requirements. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9 and 28 govern the
form and contents of briefs to the extent practicable.
(h) Service Requirements. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9 governs service
requirements.
(i) Oral Argument. The Review Tribunal must set oral argument at least 30 days
after the petition and brief are filed under paragraph (d). Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 39 governs the oral argument.
(j) Standard for Removal or Retirement. A judge may be removed from office for
willful or persistent violation of rules promulgated by the Supreme Court,
incompetence in performing the duties of the office, willful violation of the Code
of Judicial Conduct, or willful or persistent conduct clear ly inconsistent with
the proper performance of the judge’s duties or that casts public discredit upon
the judiciary or administration of justice. A judge may be removed or retired
from office for mental or physical incapacity seriously interfering with the
performance of the judge’s duties, which is or is likely to become permanent in
nature.
(k) Review Tribunal Decision. Within 90 days after the initial filings, the Review
Tribunal must render a decision. In a retirement or removal order, the Review
Tribunal may prohibit the judge from holding judicial office in the future.
(l) Opinion. The Review Tribunal must hand down a written opinion that
addresses every issue raised necessary to final disposition of the appeal. Any
member of the Review Tribunal may file an opinion dissenting from or
concurring in the Review Tribunal’s decision.
(m) Motion for Rehearing. The Review Tribunal may direct that no motion for
rehearing will be entertained, in which event its decision will be final on entry.
If the Review Tribunal does not so direct, the judge may, within 15 days after
the Review Tribunal’s decision, file with th e Clerk of the Supreme Court a
motion for leave to file a motion for rehearing and the motion for rehearing.
(n) Public Information. A document filed with the Review Tribunal, the oral
argument, any additional evidence introduced, and the Review Tribunal’s
opinion are public information.
Provenance
- Source
- txcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
b71036141fda6b02fd92e03a1ebfca442d4608585ad84ab9946b6779f6fcc138
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.