Bindinglaw

TX · rules

Tex. Disciplinary R. Judges & Jud. Candidates 12

Confidentiality and Privilege of Proceedings

activein force · 2026-04-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) In General. Except as provided in paragraph (b), all papers filed with and

proceedings before the Commission are confidential, and the filing of papers

with, and the giving of testimony before the Commission are privileged.

(b) Exceptions.

(1) A formal hearing under Rule 5 and any evidence introduced during the

formal hearing, including papers, records, documents, and pleadings

filed with the clerk are public information.

(2) A judge or judicial candidate may elect to have any other hearing open

to the public or to persons designated by the judge.

(3) If the Commission issues a public sanction, the record of the informal

appearance and the documents presented to the Commission during the

informal appearance that are not protected by attorney-client or work

product privilege are public information.

(4) The disciplinary record of a judge or judicial candidate is admissible in

a subsequent proceeding before the Commission, a special master, a

Special Court of Review, or a Review Tribunal.

(5) On the filing of a written request by a judge or judicial candidate, the

Commission may release to the person designated in the request,

including the judge or judicial candidate, the number, nature, and

disposition of a complaint filed against the judge or judicial candidate

with the Commission, except that the Commission may refuse to release

the identity of a complainant.

(6) If the Commission issues an order suspending a judge who has been

indicted for a felony or charged with an official- misconduct

misdemeanor, the order, any withdrawal of the order, and all records

and proceedings related to the suspension are public.

(7) The Commission may release to the Office of the Chief Disciplinary

Counsel of the State Bar of Texas information indicating that an

attorney, including a judge who is acting in the judge’s capacity as an

attorney, has violated the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional

Conduct.

(8) A voluntary agreement to resign from judicial office in lieu of

disciplinary action by the Commission is public upon the Commission’s

acceptance of the agreement. The agreement and any agreed statement

of facts relating to the agreement are admissible in a subsequent

proceeding before the Commission. An agreed statement of facts may be

released if the judge violates a term of the voluntary agreement.

(9) Any sanction the Commission issues against a judge or judicial

candidate for knowingly making a false declaration on an application for

a place on the ballot as a candidate for a judicial office described by

Section 141.0311 of the Election Code; any withdrawal of such sanction;

and all records and proceedings related to the sanction are public

information.

(10) The Commission may provide information to the Sunset Advisory

Commission as provided in Section 33.0322 of the Texas Government

Code.

(11) To protect the public interest, the Commission may disclose information

relating to an investigation or proceeding to the following recipients if

necessary for the recipient to perform an additional duty or function:

(A) a law enforcement agency;

(B) a public official who is authorized or required by law to appoint a

person to serve as judge;

(C) the Supreme Court; or

(D) an entity that provides Commission-ordered education to judges.

Provenance

Source
txcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
d152befe04dd249927f58c50c82f158ba48d796a348b259530555aadd46ddc3f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Tex. Disciplinary R. Judges & Jud. Candidates 12 · binding.law