Bindinglaw

TN · rules

Tenn. R. Evid. 410

Inadmissibility of Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements

activein force · 2026-09-16 – presentact-effective-date

Except as otherwise provided in this rule, evidence of the following is not, in any civil or criminal proceeding, admissible against the party who made the plea or was a participant in the plea discussions:

(1) A plea of guilty which was later withdrawn;

(2) A plea of nolo contendere;

(3) Any statement made in the course of any proceedings under Rule 11 of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding either of the foregoing pleas; or

(4) Any statement made in the course of plea discussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authority which do not result in a plea of guilty or which result in a plea of guilty later withdrawn. Such a statement is admissible, however, in a criminal proceeding for perjury or false statement if the statement was made by the defendant under oath, on the record, and in the presence of counsel.

History

Advisory Commission Comments. This rule is cross-referenced in T.R.Crim.P. 11(d). Advisory Commission Comments [1994]. Williams v. Brown, 860 S.W.2d 854 (Tenn. 1993), held misdemeanor traffic fine payments without court appearance inadmissible by analogy to Rule 410. Advisory Commission Comments [2013]. The original Advisory Commission Comment wa revised to correct an obsolete cross-reference to a now nonexistent subparagraph of Tenn. R. Crim. P 11.

Provenance

Source
www.tncourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-17
Edition
2026-09-16
Content hash
58df2ae6e5cf04ea24ae44970205bc908008f52af2a132166c179c34fb99d691
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Tenn. R. Evid. 410 — Inadmissibility of Pleas, Plea D… · binding.law