Bindinglaw

SD · rules

S.D. 4th Jud. Cir. Language Access Plan

4th Judicial Circuit: Language Access Plan

activein force · 2021-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

Fourth Judicial Circuit

Language Access Plan

I. Legal Basis and Purpose

This document serves as the plan for the Fourth Judicial Circuit of the Unified

Judicial System of the State of South Dakota, to ensure access to the courts for

persons with limited English language proficiency (LEP) and hearing impaired

persons. This plan is designed to respond to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

the Americans with Disabilities Act and the requirements imposed by Executive

Order 13166, South Dakota state law and related guidance. This plan provides a

framework for the provision of timely and effective language assistance to

persons with LEP to ensure their access to the court services of the Fourth Judicial

Circuit.

Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 USC Section 2000d et.

seq. provides that "No person in the United States shall on the grounds of race,

color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits

of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving

Federal financial assistance." Executive Order 13166 requires all agencies

receiving federal funds to address the needs of persons who, due to LEP, cannot

fully and equally participate in the agency's programs without language

assistance.

The US Department of Justice (USDOJ) has issued policy guidelines on the

responsibility of courts under this order to provide interpreting and translating

services. The USDOJ has the right to investigate complaints against any agency

that does not provide free language services when necessary to participate in the

program.

South Dakota state laws addressing court interpreting are found at SDCL 19-3

and SDCL 19-14 et. al.

II. Demographics & Needs Assessment

Interpreter needs in the eight counties of the Fourth Judicial Circuit have been

relatively limited to the more highly populated counties of Butte, Lawrence and

Meade. The demographic statistics for these counties and the state of South

Dakota are provided by the US Census Bureau, 2011 Census QuickFacts.

South Dakota:

• White persons not Hispanic: 84.4%

• Persons of Hispanic or Latino Origin: 2.9%

• American Indian Origin: 8.9%

Butte County:

• White persons not Hispanic: 92.0%

• Persons of Hispanic or Latino Origin: 3.3%

• American Indian Origin: 2.1%

Lawrence County:

• White persons not Hispanic: 92.0%

• Persons of Hispanic or Latino Origin: 2.7%

• American Indian Origin: 2.3%

Meade County:

• White persons not Hispanic: 89.4%

• Persons of Hispanic or Latino Origin: 3.5%

• American Indian Origin: 2.5%

The Fourth Judicial Circuit makes every effort to provide services to all persons

with LEP. The following list shows the frequency of the foreign languages that are

most commonly requested in Butte, Lawrence, and Meade Counties:

• Spanish

• Vietnamese

Ill. Language Assistance Resources

A. Determining the Need for an Interpreter in the Courtroom

"When a witness cannot communicate or understand the English language the

Court shall procure and appoint a disinterested interpreter or translator for

him..." SDCL 19-3-7. It is at the Court's discretion to make this determination

when an interpreter is necessary. Among the factors taken into consideration by

the court are whether a party or person whose presence is necessary or

appropriate in a court proceeding:

1. Is unable to accurately describe persons, places and events related to

the proceeding due to non-English speaking background or hearing

impairment;

2. Is unable to tell the court "what happened" over a period of time;

3. Is unable to request clarification when statements are vague or

misleading, to defend or advocate a position, or otherwise meaningfully

participate in a proceeding;

4. Is not on equal footing with an English speaking person with an

equivalent education or background;

5. Is unable to speak or understand English and translation is necessary to

allow for effective participation in a proceeding.

See Supreme Court's Committee to Study the Use of Interpreters and Translators

in the South Dakota System, 2011 Report to the South Dakota Supreme Court,

November 18, 2011, p.23-24.

The Court further determines who qualifies for an interpreter by undertaking

the following analysis:

An individual who cannot speak English, or cannot otherwise understand a

communication in English, qualifies for appointment of an interpreter if:

1. The individual is party to a proceeding;

2. The individual's presence is necessary or desirable in a proceeding (i.e.

the parent of a juvenile involved in a proceeding);

3. The individual is a person that would be directly affected by any action

or decision in the proceeding;

4. The individual is a witness in a proceeding.

Id. At 24

B. Providing Interpreters in the Courtroom

The Fourth Circuit relies primarily on the use of Language Line Services for

interpreting services within the courtroom. This service is also used by the

Lawrence County Public Defender's office in Deadwood, and is being considered

for use by the Fourth Circuit Court Services and the Clerk of Courts offices to

assist with interpretive needs relating to cases and/or supervision outside of the

courtroom setting. A list of local interpreters is also maintained in the Fourth

Circuit Court Administrator's office. Communication Services for the Deaf is

generally utilized when sign language interpreters are needed. Considerations

taken in determining potential interpreter's qualifications include:

1. What is the interpreter's native language and if language services

needed is not the native language of the interpreter, the length of time

speaking the language;

2. What formal schooling relating to the language and interpretation

services was completed;

3. What certifications the interpreter possesses;

4. What level of experience the interpreter possesses in interpretation

services.

While this is the current procedure, the Fourth Judicial Circuit Court is willing to

implement any policies, rules or laws to determine minimum qualifications of

interpreters that may be established within the UJS or South Dakota Legislature.

C. Interpreter Cost

The Fourth Judicial Circuit is committed to providing access to interpreters at no

cost to a witness or party. South Dakota law provides that if a witness or party

requires an interpreter or translator one will be provided at no cost to the witness

or party. Please contact court administration or the clerk of courts office to ask for

assistance.

IV. Training and Evaluation

The Fourth Judicial Circuit is committed to providing language access training

opportunities for all judicial officers and staff members. While training currently is

conducted on an informal basis throughout the circuit, additional policies, rules

and laws established will be implemented to further training and educational

opportunities as they pertain to interpreter services.

The Fourth Judicial Circuit will routinely assess whether changes to the LAP are

needed or mandated by policy, rule or law. The plan may be changed or updated

at any time but will be reviewed not less frequently than once a year. Each year

the Court Administrator, in consultation with the Presiding Judge, will review the

effectiveness of the court's LAP and update as necessary. The evaluation will

include identification of any problem areas and development of corrective action

strategies. Elements of the evaluation will include:

1. Number of LEP services requested;

2. Assessment of current language needs to determine if additional

services or translated materials should be provided;

3. Review of feedback from court employee training sessions; and

4. Customer satisfaction feedback.

V. LAP Effective Date: July 1, 2021

VI. Approval

Approved by

Mike Day

Presiding Judge Fourth

Judicial Circuit

Shawn Sorenson

Court Administrator

Fourth Judicial Circuit

Provenance

Source
ujs.sd.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-30
Edition
2026-09-30
Content hash
b471c81abc6a0a6028c19c645303b5311433b5e24971b415567f4e2d5b7850c6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.