SD · rules
S.D. 4th Jud. Cir. Language Access Plan
4th Judicial Circuit: Language Access Plan
Fourth Judicial Circuit
Language Access Plan
I. Legal Basis and Purpose
This document serves as the plan for the Fourth Judicial Circuit of the Unified
Judicial System of the State of South Dakota, to ensure access to the courts for
persons with limited English language proficiency (LEP) and hearing impaired
persons. This plan is designed to respond to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the requirements imposed by Executive
Order 13166, South Dakota state law and related guidance. This plan provides a
framework for the provision of timely and effective language assistance to
persons with LEP to ensure their access to the court services of the Fourth Judicial
Circuit.
Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 USC Section 2000d et.
seq. provides that "No person in the United States shall on the grounds of race,
color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits
of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving
Federal financial assistance." Executive Order 13166 requires all agencies
receiving federal funds to address the needs of persons who, due to LEP, cannot
fully and equally participate in the agency's programs without language
assistance.
The US Department of Justice (USDOJ) has issued policy guidelines on the
responsibility of courts under this order to provide interpreting and translating
services. The USDOJ has the right to investigate complaints against any agency
that does not provide free language services when necessary to participate in the
program.
South Dakota state laws addressing court interpreting are found at SDCL 19-3
and SDCL 19-14 et. al.
II. Demographics & Needs Assessment
Interpreter needs in the eight counties of the Fourth Judicial Circuit have been
relatively limited to the more highly populated counties of Butte, Lawrence and
Meade. The demographic statistics for these counties and the state of South
Dakota are provided by the US Census Bureau, 2011 Census QuickFacts.
South Dakota:
• White persons not Hispanic: 84.4%
• Persons of Hispanic or Latino Origin: 2.9%
• American Indian Origin: 8.9%
Butte County:
• White persons not Hispanic: 92.0%
• Persons of Hispanic or Latino Origin: 3.3%
• American Indian Origin: 2.1%
Lawrence County:
• White persons not Hispanic: 92.0%
• Persons of Hispanic or Latino Origin: 2.7%
• American Indian Origin: 2.3%
Meade County:
• White persons not Hispanic: 89.4%
• Persons of Hispanic or Latino Origin: 3.5%
• American Indian Origin: 2.5%
The Fourth Judicial Circuit makes every effort to provide services to all persons
with LEP. The following list shows the frequency of the foreign languages that are
most commonly requested in Butte, Lawrence, and Meade Counties:
• Spanish
• Vietnamese
Ill. Language Assistance Resources
A. Determining the Need for an Interpreter in the Courtroom
"When a witness cannot communicate or understand the English language the
Court shall procure and appoint a disinterested interpreter or translator for
him..." SDCL 19-3-7. It is at the Court's discretion to make this determination
when an interpreter is necessary. Among the factors taken into consideration by
the court are whether a party or person whose presence is necessary or
appropriate in a court proceeding:
1. Is unable to accurately describe persons, places and events related to
the proceeding due to non-English speaking background or hearing
impairment;
2. Is unable to tell the court "what happened" over a period of time;
3. Is unable to request clarification when statements are vague or
misleading, to defend or advocate a position, or otherwise meaningfully
participate in a proceeding;
4. Is not on equal footing with an English speaking person with an
equivalent education or background;
5. Is unable to speak or understand English and translation is necessary to
allow for effective participation in a proceeding.
See Supreme Court's Committee to Study the Use of Interpreters and Translators
in the South Dakota System, 2011 Report to the South Dakota Supreme Court,
November 18, 2011, p.23-24.
The Court further determines who qualifies for an interpreter by undertaking
the following analysis:
An individual who cannot speak English, or cannot otherwise understand a
communication in English, qualifies for appointment of an interpreter if:
1. The individual is party to a proceeding;
2. The individual's presence is necessary or desirable in a proceeding (i.e.
the parent of a juvenile involved in a proceeding);
3. The individual is a person that would be directly affected by any action
or decision in the proceeding;
4. The individual is a witness in a proceeding.
Id. At 24
B. Providing Interpreters in the Courtroom
The Fourth Circuit relies primarily on the use of Language Line Services for
interpreting services within the courtroom. This service is also used by the
Lawrence County Public Defender's office in Deadwood, and is being considered
for use by the Fourth Circuit Court Services and the Clerk of Courts offices to
assist with interpretive needs relating to cases and/or supervision outside of the
courtroom setting. A list of local interpreters is also maintained in the Fourth
Circuit Court Administrator's office. Communication Services for the Deaf is
generally utilized when sign language interpreters are needed. Considerations
taken in determining potential interpreter's qualifications include:
1. What is the interpreter's native language and if language services
needed is not the native language of the interpreter, the length of time
speaking the language;
2. What formal schooling relating to the language and interpretation
services was completed;
3. What certifications the interpreter possesses;
4. What level of experience the interpreter possesses in interpretation
services.
While this is the current procedure, the Fourth Judicial Circuit Court is willing to
implement any policies, rules or laws to determine minimum qualifications of
interpreters that may be established within the UJS or South Dakota Legislature.
C. Interpreter Cost
The Fourth Judicial Circuit is committed to providing access to interpreters at no
cost to a witness or party. South Dakota law provides that if a witness or party
requires an interpreter or translator one will be provided at no cost to the witness
or party. Please contact court administration or the clerk of courts office to ask for
assistance.
IV. Training and Evaluation
The Fourth Judicial Circuit is committed to providing language access training
opportunities for all judicial officers and staff members. While training currently is
conducted on an informal basis throughout the circuit, additional policies, rules
and laws established will be implemented to further training and educational
opportunities as they pertain to interpreter services.
The Fourth Judicial Circuit will routinely assess whether changes to the LAP are
needed or mandated by policy, rule or law. The plan may be changed or updated
at any time but will be reviewed not less frequently than once a year. Each year
the Court Administrator, in consultation with the Presiding Judge, will review the
effectiveness of the court's LAP and update as necessary. The evaluation will
include identification of any problem areas and development of corrective action
strategies. Elements of the evaluation will include:
1. Number of LEP services requested;
2. Assessment of current language needs to determine if additional
services or translated materials should be provided;
3. Review of feedback from court employee training sessions; and
4. Customer satisfaction feedback.
V. LAP Effective Date: July 1, 2021
VI. Approval
Approved by
Mike Day
Presiding Judge Fourth
Judicial Circuit
Shawn Sorenson
Court Administrator
Fourth Judicial Circuit
Provenance
- Source
- ujs.sd.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
b471c81abc6a0a6028c19c645303b5311433b5e24971b415567f4e2d5b7850c6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.