SD · rules
S.D. 3d Jud. Cir. Language Access Plan
3rd Judicial Circuit: Language Access Plan
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT
Counties:
Beadle, Brookings, Clark, Codington, Deuel, Grant, Hamlin, Hand, Jerauld, Kingsbury,
Lake, Miner, Moody and Sanborn
Strategic Language Access Plan
Legal Basis and Purpose
This document serves as a plan for the Third Judicial Circuit Court, Unified Judicial System of the
State of South Dakota, to provide persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) services that are
in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA},
Executive Order 13166; and SDCL 19-3 and SDCL 19-14 et al, which are reproduced in the
current South Dakota Laws Concerning Court Interpreting section of the 2011 Report to the
South Dakota Supreme Court, Supreme Court's Committee to Study the Use of Interpreters and
Translators in the South Dakota Court System. Detailed guidance is also posted on
http://www.lep.gov/ (Limited English Proficiency, A Federal lnteragency Website).
The purpose of this plan is to ensure meaningful and effective communication assistance to LEP
individuals that come in contact with the Third Judicial Circuit Court. In accordance with federal
mandates and state requirements, this court and all its personnel shall inform members of the
public that language assistance services are available to qualified LEP individuals; and upon
request or as deemed necessary by the Third Judicial Circuit Court, accommodate such needs.
Needs Assessment
According to the 2010 census data, 7.5% of the state's population (over the age of five) speaks a
language other than English and 28% of them indicated they speak English less than "very well".
The Third Judicial Circuit's most commonly used languages are:
1. Spanish
2. Karen
3. Hmong
4. Hearing Impaired
The Third Judicial Circuit Court currently determines LEP needs and provides interpreter services
in all cases and office activities in accordance with all applicable laws; and will continue do so in
compliance with any policies, rules and laws established pertaining to interpreter services.
Language Assistance Resources
A. Identifying the Need for an Interpreter
SDCL 19-3-7 states, "When a witness cannot communicate or understand the English
language the court shall procure and appoint a disinterested interpreter or translator for
him..." Listed below are factors taken into consideration while assessing interpreter
needs:
■ Inability to accurately describe persons, places and events related to the proceeding
due to a non-English speaking background or hearing impairment;
■ Inability to tell the court "what happened" over a period of time;
■ Inability to request clarification when statements are vague or misleading, to defend
or advocate a position, or otherwise meaningfully participate in a proceeding;
■ Lack of equal footing with an English speaking person with an equivalent education or
background;
■ Inability to speak or understand English; and translation is necessary to allow for
effective participation in a proceeding.
Further Analysis: An individual who cannot speak English, or cannot otherwise
understand a communication in English, qualifies for appointment of an interpreter if:
✓ The individual is a party to a proceeding;
✓ The individual's presence is necessary or desirable in a proceeding (e.g. the
parent of a juvenile involved in a proceeding, power of attorney, etc.);
✓ The individual is a person that would be directly affected by any action or decision
in the proceeding;
✓ The individual is a witness in a proceeding.
B. Providing Interpreters in the Courtroom
The Third Judicial Circuit Court's Administrative Office maintains an updated list of
interpreters, including local agencies and private individuals ("freelancers").
In the event a language-specific interpreter is needed but is not on the list or is not
available, Third Circuit Court Administration will consult with Lutheran Social Services,
lnterprecorps, Certified Languages International, and other outside sources to locate the
desired interpreter.
Although the South Dakota Court System does not have formal interpreter certification
requirements, the Third Judicial Circuit Court is actively committed to providing the best
possible interpretation in all our courtrooms; and requires adequate fluency in English
and the interpreted language.
Interpreter Cost
The Third Judicial Circuit is committed to providing access to interpreters at no cost to a witness
or party. South Dakota law provides that if a witness or party requires an interpreter or
translator one will be provided at no cost to the witness or party. Please contact court
administration or the clerk of courts office to ask for assistance.
Training and Evaluation
The Third Judicial Circuit Court is committed to providing language access training opportunities
to all judicial and non-judicial members. Currently, training is conducted periodically in various
ways; newly established policies, rules and laws pertaining to interpreter services will be
implemented without hesitation.
The Third Judicial Circuit Court will maintain and routinely assess the LAP in accordance with
mandated policies, rules or laws. The plan may be revised at any time but reviewed not less than
once a year. Each year, the Court Administrator and Presiding Judge will review the
effectiveness of the court's LAP and revise as necessary. The LAP will be evaluated for problem
areas and development of corrective action strategies. Elements of evaluation will include:
■ Number of LEP services requested;
■ Assessment of current language needs, services and materials;
■ Review court employee training sessions feedback;
■ Customer satisfaction feedback.
LEP Plan Effective Date
July 1, 2021
Approval
Approved by:
Gregory J. Stoltenburg
Presiding Judge
Third Judicial Circuit Court
Jenny Hammrich
Court Administrator
Third Judicial Circuit Court
Provenance
- Source
- ujs.sd.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
4df892d74c8b595419367100ff7ba894755f93681f2596bbe75fb055304cbb5b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.