Bindinglaw

SD · constitutions

S.D. Const. art. III, § 21

One subject expressed in title

activein force · 2026-09-24 – presentas-observed

No law shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title.

History

Amendment proposed by SL 1974, ch 1, rejected Nov. 5, 1974; amendment proposed by SL 1975, ch 2, as amended by SL 1976, ch 1, rejected Nov. 2, 1976.

Provenance

Source
sdlegislature.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
2e91cc31288f7b9ed19d31db4dfca33ac6f1bc405431cb8a8f21df4794a6d8cb
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.