Bindinglaw

SC · rules

SCRE 610

Religious Beliefs or Opinions

activein force · 2026-10-02 – presentcompiled-edition

Evidence of the beliefs or opinions of a witness on matters of religion is not admissible for the purpose

of showing that by reason of their nature the witness' credibility is impaired or enhanced.

Note:

No changes were made to the language of the federal rule. The South Carolina

Supreme Court has held that a belief in God is not a prerequisite to allowing the

witness to testify. State v. Green, 267 S.C. 599, 230 S.E.2d 618 (1976); State v. Hicks,

257 S.C. 279, 185 S.E.2d 746 (1971). However, in State v. Turner, 36 S.C. 534, 15 S.E.

602 (1892), the State was allowed to question the accused concerning comments

ridiculing religion which he had allegedly made in order to impeach his credibility.

This case is inconsistent with the rule.

Provenance

Source
www.sccourts.org
Retrieved
2026-10-02
Edition
supplied-sc-04-print-version-2026-10-02
Content hash
009622284299d1b2cc96c9d0218448cfa168b672b52c13dc0dfddb1c1d4346cf
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.