Bindinglaw

SC · rules

SCRE 409

Payment of Medical and Similar Expenses

activein force · 2026-10-02 – presentcompiled-edition

Evidence of furnishing or offering or promising to pay medical, hospital, or similar expenses

occasioned by an injury is not admissible to prove liability for the injury.

Note:

This rule is identical to the federal rule. Formerly, South Carolina law, while generally

prohibiting the admission of evidence of offers to pay, or payment of, medical or

other expenses, McIntire v. Winn Dixie Greenville, Inc., 275 S.C. 323, 270 S.E.2d 440

(1980), did allow its admission if the circumstances surrounding the payment indicated

an admission of liability rather than an act of benevolence. Crosby v. Southeast Zayre,

Inc., 274 S.C. 519, 265 S.E.2d 517 (1980). The rule strictly prohibits the admission of

evidence of offers to pay, or payment of, medical or other similar expenses.

Provenance

Source
www.sccourts.org
Retrieved
2026-10-02
Edition
supplied-sc-04-print-version-2026-10-02
Content hash
af1defd48f240278adb51fde11663f142594022f189d37f7e1fd1743228a9277
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.