SC · rules
SCRE 401
Definition of "relevant Evidence"
"Relevant evidence" means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of
consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be
without the evidence.
Note:
This rule is identical to the federal rule and is consistent with South Carolina law. State
v. Alexander, 303 S.C. 377, 401 S.E.2d 146 (1991); State v. Schmidt, 288 S.C. 301, 342
S.E.2d 401 (1986).
RULE 402.
RELEVANT EVIDENCE GENERALLY ADMISSIBLE;
IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE INADMISSIBLE
All relevant evidence is admissible, except as otherwise provided by the Constitution of the United
States, the Constitution of the State of South Carolina, statutes, these rules, or by other rules
promulgated by the Supreme Court of South Carolina. Evidence which is not relevant is not admissible.
Note:
This rule is the federal rule amended to reference South Carolina law. The rule reflects
the law in South Carolina. Levy v. Outdoor Resorts of South Carolina, 304 S.C. 427, 405
S.E.2d 387 (1991); State v. Petit, 144 S.C. 452, 142 S.E. 725 (1928).
Provenance
- Source
- www.sccourts.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-sc-04-print-version-2026-10-02
- Content hash
98c72807d88e8094980eb6beaccbb5bf46b5328f5562909d06c4619003d654c4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.