SC · rules
SCRE 1006
Summaries
The contents of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs which cannot conveniently be
examined in court may be presented in the form of a chart, summary, or calculation, provided the
underlying data are admissible into evidence. The originals, or duplicates, shall be made available for
examination or copying, or both, by other parties at reasonable time and place. The court may order
that they be produced in court.
Note:
This rule is identical to the federal rule except for the language "provided the
underlying data are admissible into evidence" and is consistent with South Carolina
case law. Adamson v. Marianne Fabrics, Inc., 301 S.C. 204, 391 S.E.2d 249 (1990); Zemp
Constr. Co. v. Harmon Bros. Constr. Co., 225 S.C. 361, 82 S.E.2d 531 (1954); Crowley v.
Spivey, 285 S.C. 397, 329 S.E.2d 774 (Ct. App.1985); Butler v. Sea Pines Plantation Co.,
282 S.C. 113, 317 S.E.2d 464 (Ct. App.1984). It should be noted that the case of Peagler
v. Atlantic Coast Line R.R., 234 S.C. 140, 107 S.E.2d 15 (1959), is inconsistent with these
prior cases and has been effectively overruled.
Provenance
- Source
- www.sccourts.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-sc-04-print-version-2026-10-02
- Content hash
57579697af67d66a8b5bb8fd584686a0a54a2deb5785bebc5b58c506840a342b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.