SC · rules
SCRE 1004
Admissibility of Other Evidence of Contents
The original is not required, and other evidence of the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph
is admissible if -
(1) Originals Lost or Destroyed. All originals are lost or have been destroyed, unless the proponent
lost or destroyed them in bad faith; or
(2) Original Not Obtainable. No original can be obtained by any available judicial process or
procedure; or
(3) Original in Possession of Opponent. At a time when an original was under the control of the
party against whom offered, that party was put on notice, by the pleadings or otherwise, that the
contents would be a subject of proof at the hearing, and that party does not produce the original at
the hearing; or
(4) Collateral Matters. The writing, recording, or photograph is not closely related to a controlling
issue.
Note:
This rule is identical to the federal rule and is consistent with our case law. It has long
been the law in South Carolina that secondary evidence is admissible under the
circumstances outlined in this rule. See, e.g., Pee Dee Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Love, 284
S.C. 371, 326 S.E.2d 650 (1984) (original lost); Windham v. Lloyd, 253 S.C. 568, 172
S.E.2d 117 (1970) (original lost); Wynn v. Coney, 232 S.C. 346, 102 S.E.2d 209 (1958)
(original in possession of opponent); Greer v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc'y, 180 S.C. 162,
185 S.E. 68 (1936) (collateral matter); Rose v. Winnsboro Nat'l Bank, 41 S.C. 191, 19 S.E.
487 (1894) (original in possession of opponent).
Provenance
- Source
- www.sccourts.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-sc-04-print-version-2026-10-02
- Content hash
c919260b9f4e51f83ca76d12531cbc88e5f524f423d9979410bff059e0b679f8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.