SC · rules
SCRCrimP 6
Rule for Chemical Analysis and Chain of Custody
(a) Report of Chemical Analysis. For the purpose of establishing the physical evidence of a controlled
substance or other substance regulated by Title 44, Chapter 53 of the Code of Laws or Rule 61-4 of the
Department of Health and Environmental Control, a report signed by the chemist or analyst who
performed the test or tests required concerning its nature shall be evidence that the material delivered
to him or her was properly tested under procedures approved by the State Law Enforcement Division
(SLED), that those procedures are legally reliable and that the material is or contains the substance or
substances stated. The report shall be admitted without the necessity of the chemist or analyst
personally being present or appearing in court provided:
(1) the report, at a minimum, identifies each item tested, the kind of test or tests
conducted on each item, and the chemist's or analyst's conclusion whether the item is
or contains a controlled or other regulated substance (to include weight or quantity, if
appropriate) in language which can be understood by a juror without the necessity for
expert testimony; and,
(2) the report is accompanied by an affidavit of the chemist or analyst who performed
the test or tests that:
(A) he or she is certified by SLED as qualified under standards
approved by SLED to analyze those substances;
(B) sets forth his or her training and experience as a chemist or
analyst, to include the number of times he or she has been qualified
as an expert witness and testified in court; and,
(C) he or she conducted the test or tests shown on the report using
procedures approved by SLED and that the report accurately reflects
his or her opinion regarding the results of those tests.
The defendant or opposing party may object to the introduction of a chemist's or analyst's report at a
preliminary hearing, or if no preliminary hearing is held, not later than ten (10) days prior to the trial of
the case. If such objection is properly made, the trial judge shall require the chemist or analyst to be
present at trial for the purpose of personally testifying.
(b) Certified or Sworn Statement. For the purpose of establishing a chain of physical custody or
control of evidence entered under Part A of this Rule, a certified or sworn statement signed by each
successive person having custody of the evidence that he or she delivered it to the person stated is
evidence that the person had custody and made delivery as stated without the necessity of the person
who signed the statement being present in court provided: (1) the statement contains a sufficient
description of the substance or its container to distinguish it; and (2) the statement says the substance
was delivered in substantially the same condition as when received.
The defendant or his attorney may demand appearance in court of the persons within the chain of
custody in the same manner as provided in Section (a).
(c) Disclosure. In a criminal prosecution any reports or papers mentioned in Sections (a) or (b) shall be
made available to the defendant or his attorney at the preliminary hearing or if no hearing is held, not
later than eleven (11) days prior to the trial of the case.
(d) Waiver of Rights. Nothing in this Rule shall preclude the right of any defendant to obtain an
expert chemist or analyst to test a substance in his behalf, provided it is tested under the supervision
of the authority having custody of the substance or of SLED. Nothing in this Rule shall preclude the
right of any party to introduce any evidence supporting or contradicting reports or papers entered into
evidence under this Rule.
Note:
Rule 6 is the language of Criminal Practice Rule 7.
Notes to 1994 Amendment:
This amendment changes Rule 6(a). Under the former rule, all the requirements of this
rule were intended to be shown by a single report. This amendment allows the report
of the chemist or analyst containing the results of the testing to be a separate
document from the affidavit of the chemist or analyst establishing the remaining
requirements of this rule. Additionally, the amendment makes minor changes to clarify
the meaning of the rule.
Provenance
- Source
- www.sccourts.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-sc-03-print-version-2026-10-02
- Content hash
a18f31c5b833191105cae5ca5b33470e3ac2ccaf1289d396c1c9d61924ddf5d3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.