Bindinglaw

SC · rules

SCRCrimP 18

Argument on Objections

activein force · 2026-10-02 – presentcompiled-edition

(a) Argument After Ruling. Counsel shall not attempt to further argue any matter after he has been

heard and the ruling of the court has been pronounced.

(b) Argument on Objection. No argument shall be made on objections to admissibility of evidence or

conduct of trial unless specifically requested by the court.

(c) Interruption of Argument. No attorney shall interrupt another in the course of his argument.

Note:

This replaces the first paragraph of Circuit Court Rule 11. The language is taken from

Rule 43(i), SCRCP. Section (c) is taken from Circuit Court Rule 11 regarding

interrupting an attorney during argument.

Provenance

Source
www.sccourts.org
Retrieved
2026-10-02
Edition
supplied-sc-03-print-version-2026-10-02
Content hash
10a70db992e0d1ef8cc41b021f980a86871b8c6a38aaae9d7b123193a820a318
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.