SC · rules
SCRCP 71.1
Post-conviction Relief Actions
(a) Procedure. The procedure for post-conviction relief is provided by the Uniform Post-Conviction
Procedure Act (Act), S.C. Code Ann. §§ 17-27-10 to -120 (1985). The South Carolina Rules of Civil
Procedure shall apply to the extent that they are not inconsistent with the Act.
(b) Time and Form of Application. An application for post-conviction relief cannot be made while an
appeal from the conviction or sentence is pending or during the time in which an appeal may be
perfected. All applications shall be made on the form set out in the Appendix of Forms. The Office of
Court Administration shall insure that an adequate quantity of these forms are available to the circuit
court clerks for distribution to persons seeking post-conviction relief.
(c) Independent Action. An application filed under the Act is an independent civil action which
should be separately filed and indexed by the clerk of court. The caption in all post-conviction relief
actions shall read: Full Name and Prison number (if any) of Applicant v. State of South Carolina.
(d) Appointment of Counsel for Hearing. If, after the State has filed its return, the application
presents questions of law or fact which will require a hearing, the court shall promptly appoint counsel
to assist the applicant if he is indigent. Counsel shall be given a reasonable time to confer with the
applicant. Counsel shall insure that all available grounds for relief are included in the application and
shall amend the application if necessary.
(e) Burden of Proof. The applicant has the burden of establishing his entitlement to relief by a
preponderance of the evidence.
(f) Filing and Service of Order. The post-conviction relief judge shall submit the signed final order or
judgment to the clerk for filing and the clerk of court shall provide notice of entry of judgment and
serve a copy of the order or judgment to the parties as provided in Rule 77(d), SCRCP.
(g) Appellate Review; Continuing Representation. A final decision entered under the Act shall be
reviewed according to the procedure specified by Rule 243, SCACR. If an applicant represented by
counsel desires to appeal, counsel shall serve and file a Notice of Appeal as required by Rule 243,
SCACR, and shall continue to represent the applicant on appeal unless automatically relieved under
Rule 602, SCACR, or allowed to withdraw under Rule 264, SCACR. If the applicant is indigent, counsel
shall assist the applicant in obtaining representation by the Division of Appellate Defense of the Office
of Indigent Defense.
Note to 1990 Amendment:
This rule is based in part on former Supreme Court Rule 50(1)-(8), and has no
counterpart in the Federal Rules.
Note to 2001 Amendments:
These amendments consolidate former Rule 71.1(f) and (g) and change the method of
appointment of counsel for indigents on appeal to conform to Rule 602, SCACR.
Note to 2004 Amendment:
The 2004 Amendment clarifies the process for filing and notification of parties of filed
orders in post-conviction relief actions.
Amended by Order dated April 28, 2004.
Note to 2007 Amendment:
In 2005, the Office of Appellate Defense became a division of the Office of Indigent
Defense. This amendment reflects this organizational change.
Note to 2009 Amendment
References to the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules in Rule 71.1 were amended to
reflect changes in the numbering of those rules by Orders of the South Carolina
Supreme Court dated January 29, 2009 and April 29, 2009.
Provenance
- Source
- www.sccourts.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-sc-01-print-version-2026-10-02
- Content hash
c43e81bace9942c1e61be340b9c7c1301a114a4dacee57cadfa11ab6f3f98589
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.