SC · rules
SCRCP 42
Consolidation; Separate Trials
(a) Consolidation. When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the
court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all matters in issue in the action; it may order all the
actions consolidated; and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to
avoid unnecessary costs or delay.
(b) Separate Trials. The court, in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice, or when separate
trials will be conducive to expedition and economy, may order a separate trial of any claim, cross-claim, counterclaim, or third-party claim, or of any separate issue or of any number of claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, third-party claims, or issues, always preserving inviolate the right of trial by jury
as declared by the Constitution or as given by a statute of the State.
Note:
This Rule 42 is substantially identical with the Federal Rule. Rule 42(b) as to ordering
separate trials is similar to State procedure, under Code § 15-27-20. Rule 42(a) as to
consolidation of cases for trial is new to State procedure, but a valuable and needed
addition. The parties and pleadings are not merged, and each action retains its own
identity; but consolidation for trial can save much time and cost, as when all claims
arise out of one auto accident, or several claims are based upon identical contracts.
Provenance
- Source
- www.sccourts.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-sc-01-print-version-2026-10-02
- Content hash
42405a8ed4e5902cd6d3f8e726756922cc6707a656f84cb54baf1efecf5df9ca
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.