SC · rules
SCRCP 32
Use of Depositions in Court Proceedings
(a) Use of Depositions. At the trial or upon the hearing of a motion or an interlocutory proceeding,
any part or all of a deposition, so far as admissible under the rules of evidence applied as though the
witness were then present and testifying, may be used against any party who was present or
represented at the taking of the deposition or who had reasonable notice thereof, in accordance with
any of the following provisions:
(1) Any deposition may be used by any party for the purpose of contradicting or
impeaching the testimony of deponent as a witness, or for any other purpose
permitted by the rules of evidence.
(2) The deposition of a party or of anyone who at the time of taking the deposition
was an officer, director, or managing agent, or a person designated under Rule
30(b)(6) or 31(a) to testify on behalf of a public or private corporation, partnership or
association or governmental agency which is a party may be used by an adverse party
for any purpose.
(3) The deposition of a witness, whether or not a party, may be used by any party for
any purpose if the court finds:
(A) that the witness is dead; or
(B) that the witness is at a greater distance than 100 miles from the
place of trial or hearing, or is out of the State, unless it appears that
the absence of the witness was procured by the party offering the
deposition; or
(C) that the witness is unable to attend or testify because of age,
illness, infirmity, or imprisonment; or
(D) that the party offering the deposition has been unable to procure
the attendance of the witness by subpoena; or
(E) upon application and notice, that such exceptional circumstances
exist as to make it desirable, in the interest of justice and with due
regard to the importance of presenting the testimony of witnesses
orally in open court, to allow the deposition to be used.
(4) If only part of a deposition is offered in evidence by a party, an adverse party may
require him to introduce any other part which ought in fairness to be considered with
the part introduced, and any party may introduce any other parts.
(5) Excerpts From Depositions to Be Offered at Trial. At least 1 day prior to
offering excerpts from a deposition in the case in chief counsel, unless otherwise
ordered by the trial judge, shall furnish to the trial judge and, at the same time and by
the same means, furnish to all opposing counsel the excerptsfrom depositions (by
page and line number) and a list of deposition exhibits which counsel expects to
introduce in the case in chief at trial. When thedeposition excerpt is offered at trial
counsel for the adverse party shall furnish to the trial judge and, at the same time and
by the same means, furnish to allopposing counsel any objections (by page and line
number) to opposing counsel's deposition excerpts and any additional excerpts from
the depositions (by page and line number) which counsel expects to be read pursuant
to SCRCP (a)(4), as well as a list of deposition exhibits to be used. With reasonable
notice to the trial judge and all counsel, other excerpts may be read.
Note to 1994 Amendment:
Rule 32(a)(5) requires that excerpts of depositions and deposition exhibits that are to
be used in the party's case in chief are to be provided to the judge and counsel 1 day
before use. Adverse counsel shall identify the portions of the deposition and its
exhibits that will be used at the time the excerpts are offered. This rule does not apply
to excerpts that are to be used for impeachment purposes.
Substitution of parties pursuant to Rule 25 does not affect the right to use depositions previously
taken; and when an action has been brought in any court of the United States or of any State and
another action involving the same subject matter is afterward brought between the same parties or
their representatives or successors in interest, all depositions lawfully taken and duly filed in the former
action may be used in the latter as if originally taken therefor. A deposition previously taken may also
be used as permitted by the rules of evidence.
Note:
This is current Federal Rule 32(a), which is an amended version of the Federal Rule
which served as the guide for Circuit Court Rule 87D. There are minor changes in the
wording of the rule, but no significant alterations.
(b) Objections to Admissibility. Subject to the provisions of Rule 28(b) and subdivision (d)(3) of this
rule, objection may be made at the trial or hearing to receiving in evidence any deposition or part
thereof for any reason which would require the exclusion of the evidence if the witness were then
present and testifying.
Note:
This is the current Federal Rule which is an amended version of the Federal Rule which
served as the guide for Circuit Court Rule 87E. There are minor clarifying amendments.
(c) Effect of Taking or Using Depositions. A party does not make a person his own witness for any
purpose by taking his deposition. The introduction in evidence of the deposition or any part thereof
for any purpose other than that of contradicting or impeaching the deponent makes the deponent the
witness of the party introducing the deposition, but this shall not apply to the use by an adverse party
of a deposition under subdivision (a)(2) of this rule. At the trial or hearing any party may rebut any
relevant evidence contained in a deposition whether introduced by him or by any other party.
Note:
This is the language of the Federal Rule which is an amended version of the Federal
Rule which served as the guide for Circuit Court Rule 87(f). There are minor
modifications in the language of the rule. This provision was deleted from the Federal
rules in 1972 because of the adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence. It was added
here because the State has not adopted Rules of Evidence.
(d) Effect of Errors and Irregularities in Depositions.
(1) As to Notice. All errors and irregularities in the notice for taking a deposition are
waived unless written objection is promptly served upon the party giving the notice.
(2) As to Disqualification of Officer. Objection to taking a deposition because of
disqualification of the officer before whom it is to be taken is waived unless made
before the taking of the deposition begins or as soon thereafter as the disqualification
becomes known or could be discovered with reasonable diligence.
(3) As to Taking of Deposition.
(A) Objections to the competency of a witness or to the competency,
relevancy, or materiality of testimony are not waived by failure to
make them before or during the taking of the deposition, unless the
ground of the objection is one which might have been obviated or
removed if presented at that time.
(B) Errors and irregularities occurring at the oral examination in the
manner of taking the deposition, in the form of the questions or
answers, in the oath or affirmation, or in the conduct of parties, and
errors of any kind which might be obviated, removed, or cured if
promptly presented, are waived unless seasonable objection thereto
is made at the taking of the deposition.
(C) Objections to the form of written questions submitted under Rule
31 are waived unless served in writing upon the party propounding
them within the time allowed for serving the succeeding cross or
other questions and within 5 days after service of the last questions
authorized.
(4) As to Completion and Return of Deposition. Errors and irregularities in the
manner in which the testimony is transcribed or the deposition is prepared, signed,
certified, sealed, indorsed, transmitted, filed, or otherwise dealt with by the officer
under Rules 30 and 31 are waived unless a motion to suppress the deposition or some
part thereof is made with reasonable promptness after such defect is, or with due
diligence might have been, ascertained.
Note:
This is the language of current Federal Rule 32(d). There is no counterpart of this
provision in the Circuit Court Rules. In essence these provisions provide that errors or
irregularities in the procedure of taking the deposition, or in depositions under written
interrogatories, or in the transcription, certification, and filing are waived if not made
at the time the error could have been corrected.
Objections to the competency of a witness, or to the competency, relevancy, or
materiality of testimony are not so waived but reserved for consideration by the court
either at a pre-trial conference or prior to the deposition being admitted.
Provenance
- Source
- www.sccourts.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-sc-01-print-version-2026-10-02
- Content hash
78e83606a470d1efd8e5771a964ec51d114198d0bd4f07a72e61f935af20d369
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.