SC · rules
SCRCP 27
Depositions Before Action or Pending Appeal
(a) Before Action.
(1) Petition. A person who desires to perpetuate his own testimony or that of another
person regarding any matter that may be cognizable in any court of the State may file
a verified petition in the court in the Circuit of the residence of any expected adverse
party. The petition shall be entitled in the name of the petitioner and shall show: 1.
that the petitioner expects to be a party to an action cognizable in a court of the State
but is presently unable to bring it or cause it to be brought; 2. the subject matter of
the expected action and his interest therein; 3. the facts which he desires to establish
by the proposed testimony and his reasons for desiring to perpetuate it; 4. the names
or a description of the persons he expects will be adverse parties and their addresses
so far as known; and 5. the names or a description of the persons to be examined and
the substance of the testimony which he expects to elicit from each, and shall ask for
an order authorizing the petitioner to take the depositions of the persons to be
examined named in the petition, for the purpose of perpetuating their testimony.
(2) Notice and Service. The petitioner shall thereafter serve a notice upon each
person named in the petition as an expected adverse party, together with a copy of
the petition, stating that the petitioner will apply to the court, at a time and place
named therein, for the order described in the petition. At least 20 days before the date
of hearing the notice shall be served either within or without the circuit or state in the
manner provided in Rule 4(d) for service of summons; but if such service cannot with
due diligence be made upon any expected adverse party named in the petition, the
court may make such order as is just for service by publication or otherwise, and shall
appoint, for persons not served in the manner provided in Rule 4(d), an attorney who
shall represent them, and, in case they are not otherwise represented, shall cross-examine the deponent. If any expected adverse party is a minor or incompetent the
provisions of Rule 17(c) apply.
(3) Order and Examination. If the court is satisfied that the perpetuation of the
testimony may prevent a failure or delay of justice, it shall make an order designating
or describing the persons whose depositions may be taken and specifying the subject
matter of the examination and whether the depositions shall be taken upon oral
examination or written interrogatories. The depositions may then be taken in
accordance with these rules; and the court may make orders of the character provided
for by Rules 34 and 35. For the purpose of applying these rules to depositions for
perpetuating testimony, each reference therein to the court in which the action is
pending shall be deemed to refer to the court in which the petition for such
deposition was filed.
(4) Use of Deposition. If a deposition to perpetuate testimony is taken under these
rules or if, although not so taken, it would be admissible in evidence in the courts of
the state in which it is taken, it may be used in any action involving the same subject
matter subsequently brought in a court of this State in accordance with the provisions
of Rule 32(a).
(b) Pending Appeal. If an appeal has been taken from a judgment of
a court or before the taking of an appeal if the time therefor has not
expired, the court in which the judgment was rendered may allow the
taking of the depositions of witnesses to perpetuate their testimony
for use in the event of further proceedings in the court. In such case
the party who desires to perpetuate the testimony may make a
motion in the court for leave to take the depositions, upon the same
notice and service thereof as if the action was pending in the circuit
court. The motion shall show (1) the names and addresses of persons
to be examined and the substance of the testimony which he expects
to elicit from each; (2) the reasons for perpetuating their testimony. If
the court finds that the perpetuation of the testimony is proper to
avoid a failure or delay of justice, it may make an order allowing the
depositions to be taken and may make orders of the character
provided for by Rules 34 and 35, and thereupon the depositions may
be taken and used in the same manner and under the same
conditions as are prescribed in these rules for depositions taken in
actions pending in the circuit court.
(c) Perpetuation by Action. This rule does not limit the power of a
court to entertain an action to perpetuate testimony.
Note:
At present Code §§ 19-17-40 et seq. provide for depositions de bene esse. This
proposal, drawn from Federal Rule 27 with minor modifications, provides an easy
method for perpetuating testimony prior to the filing of suit. It has been consistently
held that it is not a method of discovery before suit is brought. As provided in
paragraph (a)(1) the verified petition must establish that the petitioner expects to be a
party but is unable to do so at the present time, and also must specify the proposed
testimony and the names of the deponents, which indicates that the petitioner must
know in advance the information sought to be perpetuated. In appropriate cases the
rule also permits the use of Rules 34 and 35 if necessary. There are similar provisions
for retaining the testimony if the case is on appeal.
Provenance
- Source
- www.sccourts.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-sc-01-print-version-2026-10-02
- Content hash
740f6e89ac846789c1fd3a2498d933624225f3125ff620e3c8660c6daaed166b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.