SC · rules
S.C. C.J. Admin. Order No. 2026-04-20-01
2026-04-20-01
The Supreme Court of South Carolina
Re: Local Rules for Richland County Court of Common
Pleas
ORDER
Pursuant to Article V, § 4 of the South Carolina Constitution, the attached local
rules are approved for use in the Richland County Court of Common Pleas. This
order supersedes the prior Order approving the Local Rules for Richland
County dated February 13, 2026.
This order is effective upon signing and remains in effect unless amended or
rescinded by the Chief Justice.
s/John W. Kittredge
John W. Kittredge
April 20, 2026
Columbia, South Carolina
State of South Carolina
The Circuit Court of the Fifth Judicial Circuit
Daniel Coble
Chief Administrative Judge
Post Office Box 192
1701 Main Street, Room 214
Columbia, SC 29202-0192
Phone: (803) 576-1773
Fax: (803) 576-1744
dcoblej@sccourts.org
In order to assure the efficient management of the Common Pleas jury docket for Richland County,
the Chief Administrative Judge has enacted the following requirements.
CONTINUANCE REQUESTS
Before any continuance request is considered, all parties must be notified and given the opportunity
to object or consent. The continuance must state specific reasons as to the good cause for the
request. The Chief Administrative Judge will decide all continuance requests prior to the start of
the Common Pleas term. Once the term begins, the trial judge has the authority to grant or deny
any continuance requests within their discretion. A case is not continued until there is an
affirmative response from the Court or Clerk’s Office.
ORDERS OF PROTECTION
The Chief Administrative Judge will sign orders of protection. However, the moving party must
put in writing on the proposed order that they attest that none of their cases have any pending
hearing/trial dates. If they do have pending court dates, the pa rty must request a continuance for
these dates and confer with opposing counsel first. Only one order is necessary for protection.
The Clerk does not need an order for each case.
MOTIONS TO COMPEL
In accordance with Rule 11, SCRCP and this Administrative Order, the parties must communicate
orally in a good faith effort to resolve the pending motion to compel. The parties must orally
communicate after the motion has been scheduled and before the hearing of the motion – even if
they have communicated prior to the filing of the motion.
PRIORITY MATTERS
In scheduling motions, priority will be given to emergency matters, discovery motions, settlement
hearings and any matter deemed necessary in accordance with Rule 40(h), SCRCP.
MINOR/DEATH SETTLEMENTS
Settlement hearings will be held in-person as all other motions are. To have a settlement motion
heard, the moving party should file either the petition or a motion to approve settlement with the
Clerk’s Office. The petition or updated petition may be supplemented after the filing. After the
motion/petition is e-filed, the Clerk will schedule the settlement hearing. Settlement hearings will
only be heard virtually in extraordinary circumstances (e.g., guardian/PR live in another state and
cannot travel). After the settlement hearing is scheduled, the moving party shall contact the
presiding judge to inquire about their availability for a virtual hearing during that term of court.
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDERS
The Court will not entertain amended scheduling order requests without a detailed explanation of
why the amendment is necessary, and a copy of the existing scheduling order. Amended
scheduling orders will be approved if the new order contains the name of the mediator and date of
mediation.
PENDING MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER (59e)
If a party has properly filed a motion to reconsider and they have not received a decision more
than 30 days since the service, the moving party shall reach out to the Chief Administrative Judge
and provide him with the information.
The party must serve the motion in compliance with Rule 59(g), SCRCP, otherwise the motion
will likely be denied by the Chief Administrative Judge.
STATUS CONFERENCES/PRE-TRIAL HEARINGS
If the parties are seeking an informal status conference (Rule 16(e)), SCRCP, please reach out
directly to the Chief Administrative Judge’s office and inquire as to his availability. The Chief
Administrative Judge will attempt to schedule the parties for an in-person or virtual hearing as
soon as practicable. A status conference is not necessary for a first time scheduling order.
ROSTER MEETINGS
Roster meetings will be held the week prior to the trial term of court. The date and location will
be provided in the trial notice.
MEDIATION
Cases that are not in compliance with mediation under Rule 5(f), ADR, will be scheduled for a
Rule to Show Cause hearing. Parties may be excused from the hearing if they provide the Court
with Proof of ADR, a scheduling order with a specific date of when mediation will be completed,
or with a scheduled date for mediation to occur within 60 days of the Rule to Show Cause hearing,
or at the Court’s discretion.
UPDATES TO ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
This Administrative Order will be reviewed, and amended if necessary. The Chief Administrative
Judge shall meet with the RCBA Common Pleas Advisory Group on a regular basis. Failure to
comply with this Order may result in sanctions.
s/Daniel Coble
Chief Administrative Judge
Fifth Judicial Circuit
May 19, 2025 (Updated: March 27, 2026)
Provenance
- Source
- www.sccourts.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-sc-10a-2026-04-20-01-2026-04-20
- Content hash
606e78c27622e989fec54a90ebb42ddfa5f1c26f9c0826b58d4a10fcd7cf46f2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.