RI · rules
R.I. R. Evid. 410
Inadmissibility of Pleas, Plea Discussions and Related Statements
Except as otherwise provided in this rule, evidence of the following is not, in any
civil or criminal proceeding, admissible against the defendant who made the plea or
was a participant in the plea discussions:
(1) a plea of guilty or nolo contendere which was later withdrawn;
(2) any statement made in the course of any proceedings under Rule 11 of the
Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding either of the foregoing pleas;
(3) a plea of nolo contendere where the court defers sentence, places the
defendant on probation pursuant to § 12-18-1 of the General Laws, or files the case
pursuant to § 12-10-12 of the General Laws, provided that probation is the sole
sanction imposed and provided further that said period of deferral, probation, or
filing is completed without violation of the terms thereof;
(4) any statement made in the course of plea discussions with an attorney for the
prosecuting authority which do not result in a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or
which result in a plea of guilty or nolo contendere later withdrawn.
However, such a statement is admissible (i) in any proceeding wherein another
statement made in the course of the same plea or plea discussions has been
introduced and the statement ought in fairness be considered contemporaneously
with it, or (ii) in a criminal proceeding for perjury or false statement if the statement
was made by the defendant under oath, on the record and in the presence of counsel.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ri.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
8d263be9ff82f68da22837901547bdff083a9fc84e9a0fd5e905d4c6510fb9a8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.