RI · rules
R.I. Sup. Ct. R. Art. V, R. 7.1
Communications concerning a lawyer's services
A lawyer shall not
make a false or misleading communication about the lawyer or the lawyer's services.
A communication is false or misleading if it:
(a) contains a material misrepresentation of fact or law, or omits a fact necessary
to make the statement considered as a whole not materially misleading;
(b) contains any testimonial about, or endorsement of, the lawyer without
identifying the fact that it is a testimonial or endorsement, and if payment for the
testimonial or endorsement has been made, that fact must also be disclosed. If the
testimonial or endorsement is not made by an actual client that fact must also be
identified. If the testimonial or endorsement appears in a televised advertisement, the
foregoing disclosures and identifications must appear continuously throughout the
advertisement;
(c) contains a dramatization or simulated description of the lawyer, partners or
associates, offices or facilities, or services without identifying the fact that the
description is a simulation or dramatization. If the dramatization or simulated
description appears in a televised advertisement, the fact that it is a dramatization or
simulated description must appear continuously throughout the advertisement.
History
[1] This Rule governs all communications about a lawyer's services, including advertising permitted by Rule 7.2. Whatever means are used to make known a lawyer's services, statements about them must be truthful. [2] Truthful statements that are misleading are also prohibited by this Rule. A truthful statement is misleading if it omits a fact necessary to make the lawyer's communication considered as a whole not materially misleading. A truthful statement is also misleading if there is a substantial likelihood that it will lead a reasonable person to formulate a specific conclusion about the lawyer or the lawyer's services for which there is no reasonable factual foundation. [3] An advertisement that truthfully reports a lawyer's achievements on behalf of clients or former clients may be misleading if presented so as to lead a reasonable person to form an unjustified expectation that the same results could be obtained for other clients in similar matters without reference to the specific factual and legal circumstances of each client's case. Similarly, an unsubstantiated comparison of the lawyer's services or fees with the services or fees of other lawyers may be misleading if presented with such specificity as would lead a reasonable person to conclude that the comparison can be substantiated. The inclusion of an appropriate disclaimer or qualifying language may preclude a finding that a statement is likely to create unjustified expectations or otherwise mislead a prospective client. [4] See also Rule 8.4(e) for the prohibition against stating or implying an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ri.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
4dda2e503876e051bd70290658dbcac56d4fbc3e93ad2cd28623690e551b3cc9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.