Bindinglaw

RI · rules

R.I. Sup. Ct. R. Art. I, R. 32

Cases involving constitutionality of federal or state statutes

activein force · 2026-02-17 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Constitutionality of Federal Statute. A party who draws in question the

constitutionality of any Act of Congress in any proceeding in the Supreme Court to

which the United States, or any agency thereof, or any officer or employee thereof,

as such officer or employee, is not a party, upon the filing of the record, or as soon

thereafter as the question is raised in the Supreme Court, shall give immediate notice

in writing to the Supreme Court of the existence of said question. The Clerk of the

Supreme Court shall thereupon certify such fact to the United States Attorney for

the District of Rhode Island.

(b) Constitutionality of State Statute. A party who draws in question the

constitutionality, under the United States Constitution or the Rhode Island

Constitution, of any Act of the General Assembly of Rhode Island in any proceeding

in the Supreme Court to which the State of Rhode Island, or any agency thereof, or

any officer or employee thereof, as such officer or employee, is not a party, upon the

filing of the record, or as soon thereafter as the question is raised in the Supreme

Court, shall give immediate notice in writing to the Supreme Court of the existence

of said question. The Clerk of the Supreme Court shall thereupon certify such fact

to the Attorney General of Rhode Island.

Provenance

Source
courts.ri.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
0ed218e5f307e257b35ec0e473e3e9886318c74e8eb64cf9529663e85eab1998
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
R.I. Sup. Ct. R. Art. I, R. 32 — Cases involving cons… · binding.law