PA · rules
Pa. UJS Case Records Access Policy Explanatory Report
Case Records Public Access Policy: Explanatory Report
EXPLANATORY REPORT
AMENDMENTS TO THE
CASE RECORDS PUBLIC ACCESS POLICY
OF THE UNIFIED JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF PENNSYLVANIA
On October 6, 2021, effective January 1, 2022, upon recommendation of the Administrative
Office of Pennsylvania Courts, the Court amended Sections 7.0 and 9.0 of the Case Records Public
Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania to require the statewide use of the
Confidential Information Form. The specific amendments are detailed below.
Sections 7.0(A) and (C) have been amended to require filers to safeguard confidential
information using a Confidential Information Form. Prior to these amendments, an appellate or trial
court could permit the filing of any document in two versions, a “Redacted Version” and “Unredacted
Version” rather than require the use of the Confidential Information Form. Now, all courts throughout
the Commonwealth will utilize the same method to safeguard confidential information.
New Section 9.0(H) provides that these amendments do not apply retroactively to documents filed
with a court or custodian prior to the effective date of the amendments. Specifically, an unredacted version
of a document filed under prior versions of this Policy shall not be accessible to the public.
Implementing a single, statewide approach for the treatment of confidential information
throughout the courts of the Commonwealth will establish procedural uniformity and support the statewide
practice of law by members of the bar.
Provenance
- Source
- www.pacourts.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
b4ed8a2314ab2a915a110ebed1249ced925429963367e805eb12c70d739133db
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.