PA · rules
Pa. Sup. Ct. IOP § 4
Opinions
A. Circulation Schedule; Voting; Hold; Reassignment.
1. Preparation of Opinions. Preparation of opinions and responses to
circulating opinions shall be given the highest priority.
a. Majority. The assigned Justice shall, absent extraordinary
circumstances, circulate a proposed majority opinion to all
members of the Court within ninety (90) days of the assignment in
single-issue cases and serial capital PCRA appeals, within one
hundred and twenty (120) days in multiple-issue cases, within one
hundred and fifty (150) days in capital direct appeals, within one
hundred and eighty (180) days in first capital PCRA appeals, or
within forty-five (45) days of the assignment of a Children’s Fast
Track appeal. The Court should make every effort to decide cases
by clear majority disposition.
b. Concurrences and Dissents. Justices who are aligned as to the
result should collaborate as much as possible to achieve a unified
position in responsive opinions. Concurrences and dissents shall
be circulated to all members of the Court within forty (40) days of
the date on which votes on the proposed majority opinions were
due in single-issue cases and serial capital PCRA appeals, within
sixty (60) days in multiple-issue cases, within seventy-five (75) days
in capital direct appeals, and within ninety (90) days in first capital
PCRA cases. Matters may also be held for additional review by a
Justice during these time periods. In Children’s Fast Track
appeals, concurrences and dissents shall be circulated to all
members of the Court within twenty (20) days of the date on which
votes on the proposed majority opinion were due.
2. Monthly Vote Lists. Circulating proposed opinions are voted upon each
month according to the schedule provided by the Chief Justice for use in
that calendar year. Each monthly vote list shall be circulated by the Chief
Justice the first Monday of the month, or, if that date is a holiday, on the
first Tuesday of the month; the dates to circulate the vote lists may be
adjusted. The cases listed shall include all proposed majority opinions, per
curiam opinions and dispositive per curiam orders in appeal cases
submitted for the Court’s consideration as of ten (10) days prior to the
circulation of the vote list. Responsive opinions to majority opinions on a
vote list shall be circulated by 5:00 p.m. on the Friday before the vote list
is circulated; responsive opinions circulated after that time shall move the
case to the next vote list. Responsive opinions to majority opinions not
already on a vote list shall be placed on the next available vote list
following their circulation to the Court.
3. Entry of Votes. Votes on listed cases shall be entered according to the
schedule provided by the Chief Justice. Generally speaking, votes are
due on the fifth business day following circulation of the vote list. However,
that time frame is adjusted to account for holidays, court sessions and
other anticipated conflicts. The vote schedule for the calendar year
distributed to the Court by the Chief Justice specifies the vote day for each
month. Within two (2) business days following entry of the votes, the Chief
Justice will circulate to all Justices a disposition, listing the votes for each
case. Within two (2) days after circulation of the disposition, the Chief
Justice must be advised of any correction. On the next business day (the
fifth business day following the entry of votes) the Chief Justice shall
circulate to the Court and to the Prothonotary a confidential list of all cases
ready to be filed together with the votes of the Justices. No case will
appear on the confidential list unless all votes are recorded. The
Prothonotary will docket opinions consistent with the information received.
a. Permissible votes include “join majority opinion”; “join majority
opinion/author concurring opinion”; “author revised majority
opinion”; “author concurring opinion”; “author revised concurring
opinion”; “hold for concurring opinion”; “join concurring opinion”;
“author dissenting opinion”; “author revised dissenting opinion”;
“hold for dissenting opinion”; “join dissenting opinion”; “author
concurring/dissenting opinion”; “hold for concurring/dissenting
opinion”; “join concurring/dissenting opinion”; “hold for further
review”; “do not participate”; or “other.” A Justice may also “concur
in the result” or “dissent without opinion,” but these options should
not be employed if the vote is dispositive.
b. Telephone Conferences and Administrative Agenda. After receipt
of the monthly vote list, any Justice may request that any case be
held for telephone conference by making such request in writing or
electronically to the Chief Justice with notice to all other Justices.
The list will also indicate a date certain on which a telephone
conference will be held for any cases so designated. At the request
of any Justice, and upon approval by the Chief Justice, cases may
be held for discussion to take place at the next scheduled
administrative agenda.
c. Holds. Upon entry of any hold vote, the period required for
response shall correspond to the time periods allowed for
circulation of concurrences and dissents. A Justice may request
additional leeway upon circulation of an internal letter explaining the
reasons for the delay and estimating the time for completion of the
review or responsive opinion. If the review or responsive opinion is
not completed by the designated time, additional status information
shall be provided every twenty (20) days thereafter, except when
the matter has been placed on hold for another pending case; in
that event, the matter shall be resolved upon the resolution of the
pending case. Once a matter has been voted upon and the time
period initially allowed for circulation of concurrences and dissents
has passed, holds upon subsequent listings are strongly
discouraged. Held opinions are to be resolved expeditiously. In a
Children’s Fast Track appeal, in no event shall circulation of a
responsive opinion occur beyond thirty (30) days from the date the
vote was initially due.
Upon appropriate notice to a “holding” Justice and an opportunity to
respond, the Chief Justice in his or her discretion may direct the
filing of an opinion with a “holding” Justice noted as not participating
in the decision of the matter, dissenting without opinion, concurring
in the result, or with an opinion to follow, as the case may be. In
Children’s Fast Track appeals, if, within thirty (30) days of the date
votes are due on majority opinions no dissent or concurrence has
been placed in circulation, the case will be filed, and the dissenting
or concurring Justice will be noted as not having participated in the
decision of the matter.
d. Reassignment. When a concurrence or dissent garners a majority
of votes, the author of the proposed majority opinion may withdraw
the opinion to revise to accommodate the new majority, or the case
shall be reassigned to the author of the concurrence or dissent.
Upon reassignment, and absent extraordinary circumstances, the
new majority opinion shall be circulated within thirty (30) days in
single-issue cases and serial capital PCRA appeals, sixty (60) days
in multiple-issue cases, seventy-five (75) days in capital direct
appeals, ninety (90) days in first capital PCRA appeals, and, in
Children’s Fast Track appeals, within fifteen (15) days.
Notwithstanding any contrary procedures set forth above, Justices shall
give priority in both circulation of and voting on proposed opinions in
Children’s Fast Track appeals.
B. Labeling of Opinions.
1. Majority Opinion. An opinion will be labeled ‘‘Opinion’’ when a majority
joins the rationale and result of the opinion. Majority opinions shall list the
composition of the Court hearing the appeal, and shall indicate when a
Justice did not participate in the consideration or decision of the matter.
Proposed majority opinions that involve multiple, complex issues which
the authoring Justice believes may garner disparate votes should be
divided into sections. If there is a split in votes in an opinion that has been
divided into sections, the authoring Justice will be responsible for
preparing a short introductory statement summarizing the resulting votes.
2. Concurrences and Dissents. An opinion is a ‘‘concurring opinion’’ when
the Justice agrees with the result of the proposed majority opinion. A
Justice who agrees with the result of the proposed majority opinion, but
does not agree with the rationale supporting the proposed majority
opinion, in whole or in part, may write a separate ‘‘concurring opinion.’’ An
opinion is a ‘‘dissenting opinion’’ when the Justice disagrees with the
result of the proposed majority opinion.
As a general rule, an opinion is a ‘‘concurring and dissenting opinion’’
when there is more than one issue and the Justice agrees with the
majority’s disposition of some but not all issues, and is in disagreement
with the mandate. There may be occasions, however, in which a Justice
may agree with the outcome but may disagree with a principle enunciated
by a majority of the Court which will govern the outcome of other cases.
In such instances, Justices are not strictly bound to concur outright;
rather, they retain the discretion to label responses as concurring and
dissenting.
Alternatively, a Justice may choose to ‘‘concur in the result’’ or ‘‘dissent’’
without writing a separate opinion, although both options are strongly
disfavored if the vote is dispositive.
3. Other designations. An opinion shall be designated as the “Opinion
Announcing the Judgment of the Court” when it reflects only the mandate,
and not the rationale, of a majority of Justices. When the votes are
equally divided, any resulting opinions shall be designated as the “Opinion
in Support of Affirmance” or “Opinion in Support of Reversal,” as the case
may be. In all such opinions, the name of any Justice not participating in
the consideration or decision of the matter shall be noted.
C. Reconsideration Applications
1. Assignment. The Prothonotary shall assign applications for
reconsideration to the author of the majority opinion or the opinion
announcing the judgment of the Court. If the appeal was resolved by an
equally divided Court, the petition shall be assigned to the author of the
opinion in support of affirmance.
2. Circulation and Disposition. The assigned Justice shall circulate to all
members of the Court a recommended disposition within fourteen (14)
days of the assignment or within seven (7) days of the assignment in
Children’s Fast Track appeals. A Justice who disagrees with the
recommended disposition shall circulate a counter-recommendation within
fourteen (14) days of the original recommendation or seven (7) days in
Children’s Fast Track appeals. A vote of the majority is required to grant
reconsideration. In any case in which reconsideration has been denied, a
Justice may request that the order record that he or she voted to grant
reconsideration. All orders shall indicate if a Justice did not participate in
the consideration or decision of the matter.
Provenance
- Source
- www.pacourts.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
e8e877b6641256741260612c437e0bc4815300f62ae22977f73bd7c6bec4a08c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.