PA · rules
Washington Cnty. C.P. Local Rule L-212.8 - Mini-Jury Trials (2024)
Washington County local rules: Local Rule L-212.8 - Mini-Jury Trials (2024)
RULE L-212.8. MINI-JURY TRIALS
(1) Purposes. The purpose of mini-jury trials is to establish a less formal procedure for the
resolution of civil actions for money damages while preserving the right to a jury trial de
novo. As a part of the Court’s pre-trial procedure, the Court may refer cases for a mini-jury
trial upon motion of a party or sua sponte.
(2) Preliminary considerations. The following shall be considered, but shall not be controlling,
in determining if civil cases are amenable for a mini-jury trial.
(a) Time necessary for regular trial. The Court will determine if the regular trial time
would be three (3) days or more.
(b) Consent of attorneys. While the Court will attempt to obtain the consent of the
attorneys to a mini-jury trial, the Court shall have the authority to direct a mini-jury
trial as an extension of the settlement conference.
(c) Existing offer and demand. The Court will attempt to obtain the agreement of
counsel to keep any current offer or demand open for forty-eight hours after the
mini-jury trial verdict.
(d) Credibility. The Court will determine if the major issues will be resolved on the
basis of credibility.
(e) Appeals from arbitration. Cases appealed from arbitration will be presumptive
candidates for mini-jury trials.
(3) The following procedures shall apply to all mini-jury trials:
(a) Attendance of parties. Individual parties shall attend the mini-jury trial in person.
An officer or other responsible lay representative of a corporate party or a claims
adjuster for an insurance carrier shall attend the mini-jury trial.
(b) Non-binding effect. Mini-jury trials are for settlement purposes only and are non-binding. Nothing done by counsel with reference to the mini-jury trial shall be
binding on counsel, the parties, nor shall anything constitute a waiver, unless
specifically stipulated to or agreed upon by the parties.
(c) Special verdict questions. Cases will be submitted to the jurors by way of special
verdict questions. Counsel shall submit to the Special Master, forty-eight (48) hours
prior to the selection of the jury, a joint statement or proposed special verdict
questions, for use at trial. If counsel cannot agree on a joint statement, the Special
Master will select the special verdict questions to be used. Special verdict questions
for the mini-jury trial need not be the same as those for a regular jury trial. The jury
will determine the amount of damages in all cases, regardless of whether a
defendant is found to be liable or not liable. The Special Master will determine the
format to be used and make rulings on disputed questions.
(d) Size of Jury. The number of jurors shall be six (6) and the agreement of five- sixths
of the jury shall be necessary to reach a verdict. There shall be no preemptory
challenges to jurors, but jurors may be excused for cause.
(e) Presentation of the case by counsel. Each side shall be entitled to one hour for
presentation of its case unless counsel presents a compelling reason at a pre-trial
conference why more time for each side should be allocated. Presentation of the
case by counsel may involve a combination of argument, summarization of
evidence to be presented at the regular trial, and a statement of the applicable law
but only to the extent it is needed to be known by the jury in answering the special
verdict questions. Counsel may call witnesses, but cross-examination shall only be
done as part of a party’s presentation of its case. Counsel may quote from
depositions and/or reports to the extent that such evidence can reasonably be
anticipated to be admissible at the time of trial. Counsel should not refer to evidence
which would not be admissible at trial. The Plaintiff shall proceed first and shall
have a five (5) minute rebuttal following the presentation of the defendant’s case.
(f) Applicable law. The Special Master will charge the jury on the applicable law to
the extent it is appropriate and needed to be known by the jury in answering the
special verdict questions. The points for charge shall be submitted jointly by the
parties to the Special Master forty-eight (48) hours prior to the selection of the mini-jury. The Special Master shall decide on any disputes on a point for charge.
(g) Jury verdict. The jury will be asked to return a verdict if five-sixth of them agree to
it. (The same five-sixth majority need not answer each special verdict question.)
(h) Length of Deliberations. If the jury does not reach a five-sixth majority verdict
within a reasonable time, the Special Master will consider polling the jurors
individually.
(i) Oral Questions to Mini-Jury. After the verdict, counsel may address questions in
open court to the foreperson of the jury. Only questions that can be answered “yes”
or “no” or by a dollar figure may be asked. The attorneys shall be limited to ten
questions each unless a greater number is allowed by the Special Master. No
questions shall be asked such that the answers will disclose the personal view of
any particular member of the jury.
(j) Scheduling Regular Trial. Should the mini-jury trial not result in a settlement, the
regular trial shall not be held the same calendar week unless the jury is dismissed
and will not come into contact with the balance of the venire.
(k) Release of verdict. The mini-jury trial is an extension of the settlement conference,
and the verdict shall not be filed or otherwise made public.
(4) Selection of Special Masters. The Court Administrator shall maintain a roster of approved
Special Masters, who shall be attorneys admitted to practice for not less than ten (10) years.
The parties may agree upon a Special Master who is not on the roster maintained by the
Court Administrator, provided that the name of such person is submitted to, and approved
by, the President Judge or the judge to whom the case is assigned.
(5) Each party to a case selected for mini-jury trial shall pay a fee made payable to the County
of Washington and submitted to the Office of the Court Administrator for processing. The
mini-jury trial fee shall be set by administrative order, and information regarding the fee
shall be available in the Office of the Court Administrator. The special master shall be
compensated at a commensurable rate to their service, as established by the Court
Administrator and approved by the Court.
(a) Application Process. Any lawyer possessing the qualifications may submit a written
request to serve as a Special Master to the Court Administrator. The President Judge
shall certify as many Special Masters as determined to be necessary for the program.
(b) Withdrawal by Special Master. Any person whose name appears on the roster
maintained by the Court Administrator may ask to have his/her name removed or,
if selected to serve, decline to serve but remain on the roster.
(c) Disqualification. Persons selected to be Special Masters shall be disqualified for
bias or prejudice and shall disqualify themselves in any action in which they would
be required to disqualify themselves if they were a judge.
(6) Sanctions. If a party, or their counsel, fails to comply with this rule, the Special Master may
continue the mini-jury trial to another date as selected by the Court Administrator. If the
mini- jury trial is continued, the Court may enter sanctions against the offending party or
counsel, including the imposition of counsel fees, juror costs, and any other appropriate
relief.
Provenance
- Source
- www.washingtoncourts.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
f6de337b11069cc4f701353c4529a1b6e8e71c7f06f4200a7ce7c8b2aec7c563
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.