PA · rules
Philadelphia Cnty. C.P. Municipal Court-Criminal Rule 540
Bail for Traffic Court Scofflaws
A. Procedure When a Defendant Is Arrested Pursuant to Traffic Division Warrants When the
Traffic Division is Closed.
1. The defendant shall be taken without unnecessary delay to a Philadelphia Police Offender
Processing site or county prison. The defendant shall be identified, and the outstandin g
warrant(s) and total amount of any fine and costs owed shall be confirmed.
2. The defendant shall appear before an Arraignment Court Magistrate by means of two-way
simultaneous audio-video equipment for a warrant hearing. The proceeding before the
Arraignment Court Magistrate shall be as set forth below in paragraph (B).
B. Proceeding Before the Arraignment Court Magistrate. Warrant Hearing. Scheduling of Traffic
Division proceeding.
1. The Arraignment Court Magistrate shall deter mine whether the defendant should be
released pending the next Traffic Division hearing, and if so, whether collateral must be
posted by the defen dant to secure defendant’s release pending the next Traffi c Division
hearing. If the Arraignment Court Magistrate determines that collateral must be posted, the
Arraignment Court Magistrate shall set collateral as provided in Pa.R.Crim.P. 1034.
2. The Arraignment Court Magistrate shall schedule a hearing before the Traffic Division
using a Subpoena/Commitment form.
3. The defendant shall sign the Subpoena/Commitment form and shall be given a copy.
4. If the posting of collateral is ordered and is not posted by or on behalf of the defendant, the
defendant shall be brought to the county prison and shall be brought down for the scheduled
Traffic Divi sion proceeding. Provided, however, that the de fendant shall be released
promptly upon the posting of the collateral set by the Arraignment Court Magistrate.
5. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Arraignment Court Magistrate shall direct that all
outstanding Traffic Division warrants against the defendant be withdrawn.
Note: Amended by the Municipal Court Board of Judges on January 18, 2006. Effective March 1, 2006;
amended May 9, 2014, effective thirty (30) days after publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.
Comment: Consistent with Pa.R.Crim.P. 1034 the Arraignment Court M agistrate shall set collateral in a
reasonable amount, i.e. an amount which upon consideration of the defendant’s income and the defendant’s
expenses may be reasonably posted by the defendant. It is the intention of the court that most, if not all,
defendants will be released pending the date of the summary trial or hearing. However, should the records
of the Traffic Division disclose that the defendant has a history of failure to appear for Traffic Division
summary trials or hearings, especially after per sonal service of the notice of trial or scheduling order, the
Arraignment Court Magistrate may direct that the defendant be held until the summary trial or hearing date
and may be released only upon payment of the full amount of collateral or outstanding f ines. Should the
defendant be ordered held until the date of the summary trial or hearing, the summary trial or hearing should
be scheduled as soon as practical.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.phila.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
975ce22f2da873c6e7796c0108c97eb386dd5498113b1eacc0f95b106690e4cd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.