PA · rules
Mercer Cnty. C.P. Rules of Orphan's Court Rule 9
AUDITORS AND MASTERS
Local Rule 9.1:1 Notice of Hearings
a. Original Hearing – Twenty (20) days notice of the time and place of the
first hearing before the auditor or master shall be served, in writing, on
all known heirs, devisees, unpaid legatees, and distributes, or their
attorneys, and to all others by advertisement in one newspaper of
general circulation within the county and the Mercer County Law Journal
once a week for three (3) consecutive weeks prior to the date of the
hearing, unless notice be dispensed with by agreement of all interested
parties, or by order of Court. Auditors and masters shall state in their
report the manner and to whom notice was given.
b. Subsequent Hearings – Notice of succeeding hearings given by the
auditor or master, at a hearing or which prior notice has been given, shall
constitute sufficient notice of such succeeding hearings.
Local Rule 9.6:1 Notice of Filing Report. Preliminary Objections
After the report is prepared, the auditor or master shall serve on the parties, or
their attorneys, twenty (20) days written notice of the day fixed for filing the
same and in the meantime, such parties shall be allowed access thereto. Any
party interested may file preliminary exceptions to the report, before the day
fixed for the filing thereof. If preliminary exceptions are filed, the auditor or
maser shall re-examine the report and amend the report if the preliminary
exceptions are, in whole or in part, well founded. If the report is not filed at the
time fixed therefore in said notice, said report shall only be filed after five (5)
days written notice is given to the parties, or their attorneys. The auditor or
master shall certify in the report the manner and time of serving the notice
herein required.
Local Rule 9.7:1 Confirmation of Auditor’s Reports. Objections
All reports of auditors shall be filed in open court at the time and ate set by the
auditor, pursuant to these Rules. Upon the filing of the report, it shall be
confirmed nisi, which confirmation shall be made absolutely by the Clerk without
further order of Court, unless exceptions thereto are filed.
Local Rule 9.7:2 Confirmation of Master’s Reports. Objections
All report of masters shall be filed in open court at the time and date set by the
master pursuant to these Rules. Upon the filing of the report, the Court shall
enter a decree nisi either adopting the master’s recommendations or rejecting
the same. A decree nisi shall be made final by the Clerk without further order of
Court, unless exceptions thereto are filed.
Local Rule 9.7:3 Approval of Expenses and Fees prior to Confirmation
No auditor’s or master’s reports shall be confirmed or otherwise approved until
such time as the Court shall have entered an order approving the amount of
expenses to be reimbursed until and the amount of fees to be awarded until the
auditor or master. The Court may assess said expenses and fees upon any party
in interest, as it deems fit.
Local Rule 9.8:1 Absolute Confirmation. Auditor’s and Master’s Expenses
and Fees
No master’s or auditor’s repo0rt shall be confirmed by the Clerk until all
expenses and auditor’s or master’s fees have been paid to the Clerk Upon
confirmation, the Clerk shall pay all expenses and the balance of the auditor’s or
master’s fee to the auditor or master, after deducting ten percent (10%) of the
auditor’s or master’s fee to be paid to the treasurer of the Mercer County Bar
Association.
Provenance
- Source
- www.mercercountypa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
1f5ea8872f7a5d26b48b54740291b95846856c9447bc88f838c97788a405e91e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.